discussed Cited as authority (rule) Holley v. Saul Foster, 2011 WL 5509475 , at 12-19 (analyzing various scenarios under which the Fifth Circuit determined whether a step two error required reversal); see, e.g., Garcia v. Berryhill, 880 F.3d 700 , 705 n.6 (5th Cir. 2018) (“Any error at step two would likewise be harmless, given that the ALJ concluded at step four, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Garcia retained the ability to perform his past relevant work as a produce broker.”); LeBlanc v. Chater, 83 F.3d 419 , 1996 WL 197501, at *2 (5th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (“[W]here the evidence supports the ALJ’s findings under either…

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jones v. Astrue See Nicholson v. Massanari, No. 00-31370, 254 F.3d 1082 , 2001 WL 564157 , at *1. (5th Cir. May 18, 2001) (per curiam); Ledezma v. Apfel, No. 98-50255, 161 F.3d 8 , 1998 WL 723847, at *1 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 1998) (per curiam); LeBlanc v. Chater, No. 95-60547, 83 F.3d 419 , 1996 WL 197501, at *2 (5th Cir. Mar. 21, 1996) (per curiam); Snell v. Chater, No. 95-30080, 68 F.3d 466 , 1995 WL 581550, at *1 (5th Cir. Aug. 24, 1995) (per curiam). 6 The post-Stone decisions of the Fifth Circuit convey the message that the Stone “remand” directive did not do away with the Fifth Circuit’s harmless — …

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sweeney v. Astrue Unpublished opinions of the Fifth Circuit that are instructive are LeBlanc v. Chater, No. 95-60547, 83 F.3d 419 , 1996 WL 197501, at *2 (5th Cir. Mar. 21, 1996); Nicholson v. Massanari, No. 00-31370, 254 F.3d 1082 , 2001 WL 564157 , at *1 (5th Cir. May 18, 2001). 4 .

discussed Cited "see" Brown v. Colvin (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g." See LeBlanc 1996 WL 197501, at *3 .