Interest of R.A. (N.D. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Interest of R.A. (N.D. 2011). Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Rudnick v. Rode (nd, 2012-08-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rudnick v. Rode
N.D. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
In other cases, we have said “imminent” means “ ‘near at hand; mediate rather than immediate; close rather than touching; impending; on the point of happening; threatening; menacing; perilous.’ ” State v. Bruce, 2012 ND 140 , ¶ 10, 818 N.W.2d 747 (quoting State v. Kurle, 390 N.W.2d 48, 49 (N.D. 1986)); see also In re R.A., 2011 ND 119 , ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 332 ; Wolt v. Wolt, 2010 ND 33, ¶ 19 , 778 N.W.2d 802 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Falkenstein v. Dill
N.D. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
In other cases, we have said “imminent” means “‘near at hand; mediate rather than immediate; close rather than touching; impending; on the point of happening; threatening; menacing; perilous.’” State v. Bruce , 2012 ND 140 , ¶ 10 (quoting State v. Kurle , 390 N.W.2d 48, 49 (N.D. 1986)); see also In re R.A. , 2011 ND 119 , ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 332 ; Wolt v. Wolt , 2010 ND 33, ¶ 19 , 778 N.W.2d 802 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Interest of R.A.
20100343.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Jun 21, 2011.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

Filed 6/21/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 105

In the Matter of J.M.

-------------------------

Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant

State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

J.M., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20100398

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Steven M. Light, 300 NP Avenue, #201, Fargo, N.D. 58102, for respondent  and appellant; submitted on brief.

Matter of J.M.

No. 20100398

Per Curiam.

[¶1] J.M. appeals from a trial court order denying his petition for discharge and continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.  He argues the State did not prove by clear and convincing evidence he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior and remains a sexually dangerous individual.  We conclude the trial court did not clearly err in denying J.M.’s petition for discharge and affirm the trial court’s order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner