green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Ordinary rules of procedure control the interpretation of the pleading”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rothberg v. Quadrangle Development Corp.
ordinary rules of procedure control the interpretation of the pleading
discussed
Cited "see"
Hispanic Society of New York City Police Department Inc. v. New York City Police Department
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075, 1082 (7th Cir.) (pleading that accompanies intervention motion must satisfy Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a) so that “all parties understand the position, claims and nature of relief sought by the prospective intervenors”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); 3B Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 24.14.
discussed
Cited "see"
Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth
(2×)
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F. 2d 1075, 1079-1080 (CA7), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 1009 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Hunssinger v. Rockford Business Credits
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hunssinger v. Rockford Business Credits, Inc.
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075 (7th Cir.1972), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075, 1082 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Rispo v. Spring Lake Mews, Inc.
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); Lawrence v. S.E.C., 398 F.2d 276 (1st Cir. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Ramon Hernandez, United States of America v. Jesus Antonio Gastelum, Charged as Raymond Sepulveda Mendoza, United States of America v. Jorge Mejia, United States of America v. Javier Gomez
See United States v. Roach, 590 F.2d 181, 185 (5th Cir. 1979) ("Where a statement does not allude to the defendant, White v. United States, 415 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1969), Cert. denied, 397 U.S. 993 , 90 S.Ct. 1128 , 25 L.Ed.2d 400 (1970), or where all references to the defendant have been deleted, United States v. Gray, 462 F.2d 164 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 452 , 34 L.Ed.2d 303 (1972), his right of confrontation is not abridged."); Hodges v. Rose, 570 F.2d 643 , 648 n. 10 (6th Cir. 1978), Cert. denied, 436 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 2243 , 56 L.Ed.2d 408 (1978). 32 The appell…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez
See United States v. Roach, 590 F.2d 181, 185 (5th Cir. 1979) (“Where a statement does not allude to the defendant, White v. United States, 415 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 993 , 90 S.Ct. 1128 , 25 L.Ed.2d 400 (1970), or where all references to the defendant have been deleted, United States v. Gray, 462 F.2d 164 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 452 , 34 L.Ed.2d 303 (1972), his right of confrontation is not abridged.”); Hodges v. Rose, 570 F.2d 643 , 648 n. 10 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 2243 , 56 L.Ed.2d 408 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,910 United States of America v. Harold Erickson and Francis Wilson
See United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 509 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Sperry Rand Corp. v. Larson
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075, 1082 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1455, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7564 Sperry Rand Corporation v. Honorable Earl R. Larson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, and Delores Elliott and Helen Ambrose, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075, 1082 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn Dale Seawell
(2×)
See United States v. Griffin, 464 F.2d 1352, 1354-55 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 447 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1973); cf. United States v. Finkelstein, 526 F.2d 517, 526 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, Scardino v. United States, 425 U.S. 960 , 96 S.Ct. 960 , 48 L.Ed.2d 205 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Petworth Pharmacy, Inc. v. District of Columbia
United States v. Re, 336 F.2d 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 904 , 85 S. Ct. 188 , 13 L.Ed.2d 177 (1964); accord, United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 511 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); Ross v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 453 F.2d 1199, 1200-01 (2d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,737 Juanita McClure v. The First National Bank of Lubbock, Texas, Defendants-Appellees,gaines County Developments
See Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 463 F.2d 1075 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972) (securities broker sold short-term open market commercial paper to customers); Farrell v. United States, 321 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 992 , 84 S.Ct. 631 , 11 L.Ed.2d 478 (1964) (trust deeds and trust notes sold to general public in so-called “Secured 10% Earnings Program”); Llanos v. United States, 206 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 923 , 74 S.Ct. 310 , 98 L.Ed. 417 (1954) (promissory notes given in exchange for funds solic…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction Services
See, e.g., United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 509 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S. Ct. 443 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Andresen
See, e.g., Doe v. Marselle, 236 Conn. 845, 847, 859-60 , 675 A.2d 835 (1996) (“conclud[ing] that a wilful violation of [General Statutes] § 19a-583 requires only a knowing disclosure of confidential human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] related information,” not evil intent); State v. Dennis, 150 Conn. 245, 246, 250-51 , 188 A.2d 65 (1963) (holding that where defendant charged with “wilfully or unlawfully” committing “certain acts likely to impair the morals of a minor child, contrary to [General Statutes] § 53-21 . . . [s]pecific intent is not an element of the crime defined”); see…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dumke
See, e.g., United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499 (2nd Cir.1972) cert. den., 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); Buffo v. State, 415 So.2d 1158 (Ala.1982); People v. Feno, 154 Cal.App.3d 719 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 513 (1984); People v. Morrow, 682 P.2d 1201 (Colo.App.1983); State v. Hodge, 204 Kan. 98 , 460 P.2d 596 (1969); State v. Fries, 214 Neb. 874 , 337 N.W.2d 398 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Koskotas
See Rayborn v. Scully, 858 F.2d 84, 94 (2d Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 842 , 102 L.Ed.2d 974 (1989); See also United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 503-504 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); United States v. Mitchell, 769 F.2d 1544, 1547-11 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1066 , 106 S.Ct. 819 , 88 L.Ed.2d 792 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Board of Trade, Inc.
See also Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 463 F.2d 1075 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rego Crescent Corp. v. Tymon (In Re Rego Crescent Corp.)
See, e.g., Frasher v. Robinson, (In the Matter of Frasher, Inc.) 458 F.2d 492, 493 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972) (absent inequitable conduct, bona fide claims based upon loans from majority shareholders will not be subordinated); Spach v. Bryant, 309 F.2d 886, 889 (5th Cir.1962) (where, in a bad year for their farming corporation, the two shareholders thereof had paid themselves salaries of $50,000 and immediately lent that sum to the corporation, subordination is unappropriate because there had been no fraud or bad faith on the part of the stoc…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lutz
See, e. g., United States v. Griffin, 464 F.2d 1352, 1357 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 444 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome P. Lutz, United States of America v. Jack D. Stewart, United States of America v. Perry A. White, United States of America v. Larry Zitek
See, e. g., United States v. Griffin, 464 F.2d 1352, 1357 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 444 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jess Bernard Shannahan
See also United States v. Cooper, 462 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 452 , 34 L.Ed.2d 303 (1972), a fake bomb case; cf. United States v. McAvoy, 574 F.2d 718 (2d Cir. 1978); United States v. Amos, 566 F.2d 899 (4th Cir. 1977); United States v. Harris, 530 F.2d 576 (4th Cir. 1976). 2 Finally, Shannahan contends that the court erred in not permitting the defense to use, on cross-examination, an F.B.I. agent’s reports of a witness’ prior statements made during interviews.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Mid-Town Produce Terminal, Inc., Bankrupt. G. J. Sinclair v. James R. Barr, Trustee
See, e. g., Frasher v. Robinson, 458 F.2d 492 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); Spach v. Bryant, 309 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1962); For bush v. Bartley, 78 F.2d 805 (10th Cir. 1935).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,827, 1 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1285 United States of America v. Hunter Brooks Brashier, United States of America v. John Michael Coughlan, Sr.
See also United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); United States v. Koenig, 388 F.Supp. 670 (S.D.N.Y.1974). 24 Little litigation was initiated under the Act after its passage.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brashier
See also United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); United States v. Koenig, 388 F.Supp. 670 (S.D.N.Y.1974). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Massaro
See also this Circuit’s holding in United States v. DeLeo, 422 F.2d 487, 495 (1970), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 1355 , 25 L.Ed.2d 648 (1970), and the Second Circuit case of United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 504-5 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mejias
See United States v. Feinberg, supra, 383 F.2d at 65 ; see also, United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 503-4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972); United States v. DeMasi, supra, 445 F.2d at 255 ; United States v. Stein, supra, 456 F.2d at 848-49 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Dempster
See, e.g., Sanders v John Nuveen & Co, Inc, 463 F2d 1075, 1079 (CA7, 1972), cert den 409 US 1009 ; 93 S Ct 443 ; 34 L Ed 2d 302 (1972); United States v Hill, 298 F Supp 1221, 1226-1227 (Conn, 1969); Anderson v Francis I du Pont & Co, 291 F Supp 705, 708 (Minn, 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Koenig
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 509 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Santo Polizzi, United States of America v. Jack S. Shapiro, United States of America v. Peter James Bellanca, United States of America v. Anthony Giardano, United States of America v. Arthur J. Rooks, United States of America v. Anthony Joseph Zerilli, United States of America v. Emprise Corporation, a New York Corporation
See also United States v. Griffin, 464 F.2d 1352, 1355-1357 (9 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 444 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972), Having carefully reviewed the entire reporter's transcript of trial and all documents in evidence, we find that there is no variance between the allegations of the indictment and information and the evidence presented at trial and that therefore the trial court did not err in not giving a 'multiple conspiracy' instruction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Polizzi
See also United States v. Griffin, 464 F.2d 1352, 1355-1357 (9 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 444 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972), Having carefully reviewed the entire reporter’s transcript of trial and all documents in evidence, we find that there is no variance between the allegations of the indictment and information and the evidence presented at trial and that therefore the trial court did not err in not giving a “multiple conspiracy” instruction.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dornau
See also United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kansai Iron Works, Ltd.
v.
Marubeni-Iida, Inc.
v.
Marubeni-Iida, Inc.
No. 72-384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1972.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (1)
Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.