Est. of Clemetson (N.D. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Est. of Clemetson (N.D. 2012). Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Knudson v. Kyllo (nd, 2012-07-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Knudson v. Kyllo
N.D. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Clemetson, 2012 ND 28, ¶ 19 , 812 N.W.2d 888 (testimony may be uncontradicted, but not credible, and a trier of fact need not accept undisputed testimony).
cited Cited "see" Miller v. Walsh County Water Resource District
N.D. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Estate of Clemetson , 2012 ND 28, ¶ 19 , 812 N.W.2d 388 (testimony may be uncontradicted, but not credible, and a trier of fact need not accept undisputed testimony).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carlson v. GMR Transportation, Inc.
N.D. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Estate of Clemetson, 2012 ND 28, ¶ 13 , 812 N.W.2d 388 . [¶ 10] Ordinarily, the issue whether a statute of limitations bars an action should precede consideration of the merits, because if it does other issues need not be addressed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLC (2×)
N.D. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at ¶ 23; see also In re Estate of Clemetson, 2012 ND 28, ¶ 8 , 812 N.W.2d 388 (a prima facie case is a “bare minimum” and is established if the party bearing the burden of proof presents evidence strong enough, if uncontradieted, to support a finding in that party’s favor). [¶ 27] Northstar moved to amend its complaint to add a tort claim of fraud, and its amended complaint included a fraud claim under N.D.C.C. § 9-03-08.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estate of Clemetson
20110108.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Feb 17, 2012.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

Filed 2/17/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 26

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

William Cody Bruederle, Jr., Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20110179 - 20110180

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jacob Tyler Rodenbiker, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Bruederle

Nos. 20110179 - 20110180

Per Curiam.

[¶1] William Cody Bruederle, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders and amended criminal judgments revoking his probation.  On appeal, Bruederle argues the court erred in revoking his probation based on an allegation that he committed a new offense because he had not been convicted of committing a new offense.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).   See State v. Wetzel , 2011 ND 218, 806 N.W.2d 193 (a criminal conviction is not required to revoke probation based on an allegation that the probationer committed a new offense).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers