State v. Chisholm (N.D. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Chisholm (N.D. 2012). Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Burton (nd, 2025-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Burton
N.D. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Chisholm, 2012 ND 147, ¶ 10 , 818 N.W.2d 707 ; State v. Thompson, 2010 ND 10, ¶ 10 , 777 N.W.2d 617 .
discussed Cited "see" Interest of Graham
N.D. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Doppler, 2013 ND 54, ¶ 7 , 828 N.W.2d 502 (“The district court exercises broad discretion in determining whether to admit or exclude evidence, and its determination will be reversed on appeal only for an abuse of discretion.”) (quoting State v. Chisholm, 2012 ND 147, ¶ 10 , 818 N.W.2d 707 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Chisholm
20110228.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Jul 12, 2012.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published

Filed 7/12/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 127

In the Interest of Kelly Tanner

State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

Kelly Tanner, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20120084

Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Gary D. Neuharth, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 346, Oakes, ND 58474-0346, for petitioner and appellee.

Kimberly J. Radermacher, P.O. Box 39, Ellendale, ND 58436, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of Tanner

No. 20120084

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Kelly Tanner appealed from a district court order civilly committing him as a sexually dangerous individual.  On appeal, Tanner argues the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and that he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom