Everett v. State, 821 N.W.2d 385 (N.D. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Everett v. State, 821 N.W.2d 385 (N.D. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Everett v. State (nd, 2015-07-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Everett v. State
N.D. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 2012 ND 189 , 821 N.W.2d 385 ; Everett v. State , 2011 ND 221 , 806 N.W.2d 438 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 226 , 795 N.W.2d 37 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 4 , 789 N.W.2d 282 ; Everett v. State , 2008 ND 199 , 757 N.W.2d 530 ; see also State v. Everett , 2014 ND 191 , 858 N.W.2d 652 . [¶2] Everett contends in this appeal that the district court erred in denying his post- conviction relief application, arguing that the court denied his right to a fair appeal in a previous appeal by not ruling on the State’s motion for protective order and ruling after the fact on disc…
discussed Cited "see" Everett v. State
N.D. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 2012 ND 189 , 821 N.W.2d 385 ; Everett v. State , 2011 ND 221 , 806 N.W.2d 438 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 226 , 795 N.W.2d 37 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 4 , 789 N.W.2d 282 ; Everett v. State , 2008 ND 199 , 757 N.W.2d 530 ; see also State v. Everett , 2014 ND 191 , 858 N.W.2d 652 . [¶2] Everett contends in this appeal that the district court erred in denying his post- conviction relief application, arguing that the court denied his right to a fair appeal in a previous appeal by not ruling on the State’s motion for protective order and ruling after the fact on disc…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Everett
N.D. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 2012 ND 189 , 821 N.W.2d 385 ; Everett v. State , 2011 ND 221 , 806 N.W.2d 438 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 226 , 795 N.W.2d 37 ; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 4 , 789 N.W.2d 282 ; Everett v. State , 2008 ND 199 , 757 N.W.2d 530 . [¶2] In February 2014, Everett filed this petition alleging abuse of process and denial of his due process rights, contending the district court improperly granted the State’s demand for a change of judge in the early stages of the underlying criminal proceeding.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Everett
v.
State
20120179.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Sep 25, 2012.
✓ 821 N.W.2d 385
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

Filed 9/25/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 192

In the Matter of Stanton Quilt

-----------------------------

Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant

State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

Stanton Quilt, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20120176

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellee.

Gregory I. Runge, 1983 E. Capitol Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellant.

Matter of Quilt

No. 20120176

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Stanton Quilt appeals from a trial court order denying his request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.  Quilt argues the trial court erred in finding he has a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a sexual disorder, personality disorder, or other mental disorder or dysfunction; is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct; and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior.  We conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner