Martire v. Martire (N.D. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Martire v. Martire (N.D. 2012). Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Martire' v. Martire' (nd, 2016-03-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Martire' v. Martire' (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.D. · 2016 · confidence medium
I [¶2] This is a continuation of “contentious” divorce proceedings between parties who “accumulated significant assets during their marriage.” Martiré v. Martiré , 2012 ND 197, ¶¶ 2, 3 , 822 N.W.2d 450 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Martiré v. Martiré (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.D. · 2016 · confidence medium
I [¶ 2] This is a continuation of “contentious” divorce proceedings between parties who “accumulated significant assets-during their marriage.” Martiré, v. Martiré, 2012 ND 197, ¶¶ 2, 3 , 822 N.W.2d 450 .
cited Cited "see" Hoverson v. Hoverson
N.D. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martire, 2012 ND 197, ¶ 6 , 822 N.W.2d 450 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shae v. Shae
N.D. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at ¶ 14; see also Martiré, 2012 ND 197, ¶¶ 23-24 , 822 N.W.2d 450 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Steen v. State (2×)
N.D. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Not only is parental alienation under N.D.C.C. § 14- 09-06.2(1)(e) a “significant factor” in determining primary residential responsibility, Doll v. Doll , 2011 ND 24 , ¶ 27, 794 N.W.2d 425, this Court has said “a parent who willfully alienates a child from the other parent may not be awarded custody based on that alienation.” McAdams v. McAdams , 530 N.W.2d 647, 650 (N.D. 1995); see also Martiré , 2012 ND 197, ¶ 17 , 822 N.W.2d 450, and cases collected therein.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dieterle v. Dieterle (2×)
N.D. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Not only is parental alienation under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(l)(e) a “significant factor” in determining primary residential responsibility, Doll v. Doll, 2011 ND 24, ¶ 27 , 794 N.W.2d 425 , this Court has said “a parent who willfully alienates a child from the other parent may not be awarded custody based on that alienation.” McAdams v. McAdams, 530 N.W.2d 647, 650 (N.D.1995); see also Martiré, 2012 ND 197, ¶ 17 , 822 N.W.2d 450 , and cases collected therein.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martire
v.
Martire
20110197.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Sep 25, 2012.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

Filed 9/25/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 200

Interest of B.K.

William Pryatel, M.D.,

Eduarado Yabut, M.D., and

North Dakota State Hospital, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

B.K., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20120330

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, 208 Second Avenue SW, P.O. Box 1727, Jamestown, ND 58402-1727, for petitioner and appellee.

Lawrence P. Kropp, 105 Tenth Street SE, Jamestown, ND 58401-5549, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of B.K.

No. 20120330

Per Curiam.

[¶1] B.K. appeals from a district court order committing him to the North Dakota State Hospital for one year.  Because the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring