green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Jose Trucking Corp.
Wycoff v. Nichols, 32 F.R.D. 370 (W.D.Mo.1963); see General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gordon
See General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir.1973), cert denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A \Macho\""
See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F.2d 973 , 984 n. 21 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chokwe Lumumba
See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F.2d 973 , 982 n. 15 (9th Cir.1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miranda v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F.2d 973, 983-87 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974). 12 [¶] In conclusion, we hold that the district court does not have the power to impose monetary sanctions against attorneys without affording them procedural due process as protective as that afforded by Fed.R.App.P. 46(c). 13 In this case, the district court did not provide the attorneys with an opportunity to show cause to the contrary before imposing the sanctions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Victor Miranda v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company
See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F.2d 973, 983-87 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974). 12 27 In conclusion, we hold that the district court does not have the power to impose monetary sanctions against attorneys without affording them procedural due process as protective as that afforded by Fed.R.App.P. 46(c). 13 In this case, the district court did not provide the attorneys with an opportunity to show cause to the contrary before imposing the sanctions.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings In Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.
See General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Florida v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
See General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Vincent & Vincent, Inc. v. Spacek
See General Dynamics Cory. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
AG Rancho Equipment Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
See General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1211 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lucero
See Westerberg v. District Court, 181 Colo. 10 , 506 P.2d 746 (1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 925 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974). 5 “We hold, therefore, that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.” Argersinger, 407 U.S. at 37 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Doctor's General Hospital
Wycoff v. Nichols, 32 F.R.D. 370 (W.D.Mo.1963); see General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204 (Eighth Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hurst
See e.g., Weiss v. Burr, 484 F.2d 973, 983 (9th Cir.) (“the existence of the requisite [attorney] misconduct can be gleaned from the reporter’s transcript”) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1973); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 94 (6th Cir.1965) (findings not necessary where record included as part of criminal contempt certificate); State v. Yates, 208 Or. 491 , 302 P.2d 719, 722 (1956) (per curiam) (clear and specific findings of fact re contempt can appear either in separate findings or in the judgment itself); Edwards v. Edwards, 254 S.C. 466 , 176…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg
See, e.g., General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1213 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974) (right to assert privilege does not free claimant of responsibility to respond in pretrial discovery when information sought bears upon claimant’s own counterclaim and affirmative defenses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United States
See also General Dynamics Corporation v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204 , 1210 (8th Cir.1973) (citing Kordel for proposition that protective order may issue in “extreme” cases where no corporate agent can answer interrogatories without “real and appreciable” risk of self-incrimination), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, Intervenor
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2035, at 264-65 (1970); see also General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir.1973) (burden on movant to make specific demonstration of necessity for pro *8 tective order), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974); Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 93 F.R.D. 471, 479-80 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (“the court must find that definite criteria have been satisfied before issuing a protective order”); cf. Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104, 118-19 , 86 S.Ct. 234 , 242-43, 13 L.Ed.2d 152 (1964) …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farnum v. G.D. Searle & Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204, 1212 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bruzzese
(2×)
See also Moffett v. State, 291 Ala. 382 , 281 So.2d 630 (1973), cert. den., 414 U.S. 1161 , 94 S.Ct. 924 , 39 L.Ed.2d 114 (1974); People v. Green, 14 Ill.App.3d 972, 981 , 304 N.E.2d 32, 40 (1973); Clark v. State, 548 S.W.2d 888 (Tex.Cr.App.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Closed Circuit Corp. of America v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.
See Brown v. Moore, 247 F.2d 711 , 716 n.6 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 355 U.S. 882 , 78 S.Ct. 148 , 2 L.Ed.2d 112 (1957); see also General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co., 481 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1162 , 94 S.Ct. 926 , 39 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parks
v.
Regan, Prison Superintendent
v.
Regan, Prison Superintendent
No. 73-5906.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1974.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.