Anderson v. Radcliff, 421 U.S. 939 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Anderson v. Radcliff, 421 U.S. 939 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Parks v. Brown (ca10, 1988-03-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Parks v. Brown
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093 (10th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975); Bromley v. Crisp, 561 F.2d 1351 (10th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 908 , 98 S.Ct. 1458 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Parks v. Brown
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093 (10th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975); Bromley v. Crisp, 561 F.2d 1351 (10th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 908 , 98 S.Ct. 1458 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Raiford v. State (2×)
Md. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093, 1096 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Application of Bertelson
Mont. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
Crawford v. Roy (1978), 176 Mont. 227 , 577 P.2d 392 ; see, De Coteau v. District County Ct. (1975), 420 U.S. 425 , 428-30 & n. 3, 95 S.Ct. 1082 , 1085-1086 & n. 3, 43 L.Ed.2d 300 , reh. den. 421 U.S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 .
cited Cited "see" Terry Lee Radcliff v. Park Anderson, Warden, William Lynn Stringfield v. John Grider, Warden, Oklahoma State Reformatory, and Sam Isaacs, Probation Andparole Officer, Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma
10th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See 95 S.Ct. 1667 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lloyd v. State Division of Parole & Probation
D. Maryland · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093 (10 Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975) (expansive interpretation effectively applied retroactively).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Heim
N.M. Ct. App. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
See Mescolero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145 , 93 S.Ct. 1267 , 36 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973); In Re Cantrell, 159 Mont. 66 , 495 P.2d 179 (1972); Compare, DeCoteau v. District County Court, 420 U.S. 425 , 95 S.Ct. 1082 , 43 L.Ed.2d 300 (1975), reh. denied, 421 U. S. 939 , 95 S.Ct. 1667 , 44 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975). 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson, Warden
v.
Radcliff
No. 74-1061.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 21, 1975.
421 U.S. 939
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.