green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ramsey
See United States v. Pollard, 509 F.2d 601 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Wayne Shores
(2×)
See United States v. Pollard, 509 F.2d 601, 604 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975); Edwards, 696 F.2d at 1280 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of Defense
See Boruski v. United States Government, 493 F.2d 301 , 305 n. 5 (2nd Cir.1974), appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 808 , 95 S.Ct. 20 , 42 L.Ed.2d 34 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975) ; James v. Ambrose, 367 F.Supp. 1321, 1327 (D.St.Croix 1973); Mathis v. Laird, 324 F.Supp. 885, 887 (M.D.Fla.1971), aff’d, 457 F.2d 926 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 871 , 93 S.Ct. 201 , 34 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972). *115 We are presented, of course, with a somewhat unusual case, in that Walters has made no serious effort to exhaust his administrative remedies. 15 We need not and d…
cited
Cited "see"
Kolody v. United States Government
See Boruski v. United States Government, 493 F.2d 301 , 304 n. 5. (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bill R. Clark
See United States v. Sellaro, 514 F.2d 114, 120-21 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975); United States v. Hanon, 428 F.2d 101, 107-08 (8th Cir. 1970) (banc), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 952, 91 S.Ct. 1608 , 29 L.Ed.2d 122 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Pollard, 509 F.2d 601 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maximo Avila-Dominguez, Albert Perez, Evangeline Salazar and Carolyn Sanchez
See United States v. Boerner, 508 F.2d 1064, 1068 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orange Jell Beechum
(2×)
See United States v. Pollard, 509 F.2d 601 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orange Jell Beechum
(2×)
See United States v. Pollard, 509 F.2d 601 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 2419 , 44 L.Ed.2d 681 , 423 U.S. 845 , 96 S.Ct. 84 , 46 L.Ed.2d 68 (1975) It is important to note at the outset that the phrases "extrinsic offenses" and "other crimes" are used to refer not merely to evidence of convictions, but also to evidence of bad acts likely to induce the jury to believe that the defendant has committed a prior or subsequent criminal offense, regardless of whether defendant has been formally charged. 2 Beechum contends that it was error to allow the prosecutor repeatedly to ask…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sellaro
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-6260.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Jun 9, 1975.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.