In re Disbarment of Morgan, 422 U.S. 1004 (1975). · Go Syfert
In re Disbarment of Morgan, 422 U.S. 1004 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Intervening (ca6, 2002-06-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Intervening
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wheeler v. Barrera, 417 U.S. 402, 427 , 94 S.Ct. 2274 , *809 41 L.Ed.2d 159 (1974), modified on another ground, 422 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 2625 , 45 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975) (recognizing that states and local agencies must fulfill their part of a spending clause contract if they choose to accept the funds); King, 392 U.S. at 333 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 ; see also South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 206-08 , 107 S.Ct. 2793 , 97 L.Ed.2d 171 (1987) (noting that clearly stated conditions permit a State to be “cognizant of the consequences of their participation”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Morgan
No. D-44.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1975.
422 U.S. 1004
Consideration, Matter, Took.
Published

It having been reported to this Court that Edward LeRoy Morgan, of Phoenix, Ariz., has been disbarred from the practice of law in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and this Court by order of March 24, 1975 [420 U. S. 988], having suspended the said Edward LeRoy Morgan from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred ;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired ;

It is ordered that the said Edward LeRoy Morgan, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.*