Sumitomo Forestry Co. v. Thurston Cnty., 423 U.S. 1081 (1976). · Go Syfert
Sumitomo Forestry Co. v. Thurston Cnty., 423 U.S. 1081 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mitchell (kanctapp, 1979-09-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mitchell
Kan. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Texas v. White, 423 U.S. 67 , 46 L.Ed.2d 209 , 96 S.Ct. 304 , rehearing denied 423 U.S. 1081 (1975), and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , where delayed searches made at a later time and place were approved when probable cause and exigent circumstances existed at the time the vehicle was seized and probable cause still existed at the time the search was made.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd., of Japan
v.
Thurston County, Washington Texas v. White Bauman v. United States Ritter v. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior Wiethe v. Curry Burns v. Decker Ward v. Carpenter, Sheriff Sayles v. Sirica, U. S. District Judge Randle v. United States Blevins v. United States Toda v. Tanaka Green v. United States Department of Labor Burdeau v. Trustees of the California State Colleges Roots v. Woodall Curry v. Jensen Clark v. Alabama Williams v. New York Green v. Department of Public Welfare of Massachusetts
No. 74-1457; No. 75-124; No. 75-301; No. 75-314; No. 75-467; No. 75-560; No. 75-5124; No. 75-5212; No. 75-5312; No. 75-5396; No. 75-5404; No. 75-5408; No. 75-5409; No. 75-5420; No. 75-5450; No. 75-5490; No. 75-5531; No. 75-5573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1976.
423 U.S. 1081
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published

ante, p. 831;

ante, p. 67;

ante, p. 946;

ante, p. 947;

ante, p. 941;

ante, p. 1017;

ante, p. 916;

ante, p. 949 ;

ante, p. 988;

ante, p, 1020;

ante, p. 989;

ante, p. 976;

ante, p. 989;

ante, p. 997;

ante, p. 998;

ante, p. 937;

ante, p. 990; and

ante, p. 976. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.