Unarco Indus., Inc. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 424 U.S. 916 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Unarco Indus., Inc. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 424 U.S. 916 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
91 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nelton v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company (laed, 2025-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nelton v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
E.D. La. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fisher v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 895 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1990) and Netto v. Amtrak, 863 F.2d 1210, 1216 (5th Cir. 1989). 81 10A Wright, Miller, and Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2740 (1983). 82 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 F.2d 896, 901 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1082 , 101 S.Ct. 866 , 66 L.Ed.2d 806 (1981) (quoting Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton–Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 297 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976)). 83 Gossett v. Du–Ra–Kel Corp., 569 F.2d …
discussed Cited "see" Sharon Kinkead v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Prods., 520 F.2d 289, 297 (8th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976) (stating that a discovery motion cannot be used to postpone summary judgment without some showing of relevance).
cited Cited "see" In Re Scott County Master Docket
D. Minnesota · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 293 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f).
discussed Cited "see" John Peterson Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
D. Minnesota · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976); Umdenstock v. American Mortgage & Investment Co., 495 F.2d 589, 592 (10th Cir.1974).
discussed Cited "see" Wendell P. Engelstad, M.D. v. Virginia Municipal Hospital and Virginia Hospital Commission
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harron v. United Hospital Center, Inc., 522 F.2d 1133, 1134 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 321 (1976) (court dismisses as “frivolous” radiologist claim that the hospital’s termination of his oral contract amounted to a reduction of his staff privileges, invoking hospital bylaws’ procedural requirement.) In addition to theoretical problems, there are enormous practical problems associated with adopting Dr. Engelstad’s expansive interpretation of the hospital bylaws’ language: “reduction or termination of staff privileges.” Essentially…
cited Cited "see" Nestle Co., Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc.
D. Conn. · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 297 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Moats v. United States
W.D. Mo. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Lyons v. Board of Ed. of Charleston, Etc., 523 F.2d 340, 347 (8 Cir. 1975), which quoted the following from Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 293 (8 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1975): Summary judgment is always warranted where the party resisting the motion does so by relying solely upon his pleadings and submits no evidence to rebut the moving party’s conclusive demonstration of absence of a genuine issue of material fact.
discussed Cited "see" Spencer v. Board of Police Commissioners
W.D. Mo. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Lyons v. Board of Ed. of Charleston, Etc., 523 F.2d 340, 347 (8 Cir. 1975), which quoted the following from Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., 520 F.2d 289, 293 (8 Cir. 1975), cert. denied 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1975): * Summary judgment is always warranted where the party resisting the motion does so by relying solely upon his pleadings and submits no evidence to rebut the moving party’s conclusive demonstration of absence of a genuine issue of material fact.
discussed Cited "see" Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center
E.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Harron v. United Hospital Center, Inc., 522 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 321 (1976); Riggall v. Washington County Medical Society, 249 F.2d 266 (8th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 954 , 78 S.Ct. 540 , 2 L.Ed.2d 530 (1958); Nankin Hospital v. Michigan Hospital Service, 361 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Mich.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Humphreys, Hutcheson, & Moseley v. Donovan, 755 F.2d 1211, 1219 (6th Cir.1985); see also Howell v. Jones, 516 F.2d 53, 58 (5th Cir.) (“The great weight of authority ... refuses to extend the attorney-client privilege to the fact of consultation or employment _” (citing 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2313, and McCormick, Evidence § 90 (2d ed.1972))), reh’g denied and reh’g en banc denied, 521 F.2d 815 (5th Cir.1975) (unpublished table decision), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 321 , reh’g denied, 425 U.S. 945 , 96 S.Ct. 1687 , 48 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
D.C. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
R.Civ.P. 56). 10 However, the rule “provides for comparatively limited discovery for the purpose of showing facts sufficient to withstand a summary judgment motion, [unlike] Rule 26, which provides for broad pretrial discovery.” First Nat’l Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co., 391 U.S. 253, 265 , 88 S.Ct. 1575 , 20 L.Ed.2d 569 (1968); see, e.g., Willmar Poultry Co. v. Morton-Norwich Products, 520 F.2d 289, 297 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 915 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 320 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Drs. Steuer & Latham, P.A. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.
D.S.C. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Harron v. United Hospital Center, Inc., 522 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 321 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ray Sandstrom v. Robert Butterworth, Sheriff (2×)
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Farmer v. Strickland, supra, 652 F.2d at 437-39 ; see also Howell v. Jones, 516 F.2d 53, 59 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916 , 96 S.Ct. 1116 , 47 L.Ed.2d 321 (1976); Theriault v. United States, 481 F.2d 1193, 1196 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1114 , 94 S.Ct. 847 , 38 L.Ed.2d 742 and sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Unarco Industries, Inc.
v.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
No. 75-955.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
424 U.S. 916
Published

C. A. 9th Cir, Certiorari denied.