green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the reviewing eourt[’s] ... statutory power to vacate or modify is unrestricted.”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Terry Felder
the reviewing eourt ... statutory power to vacate or modify is unrestricted.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Short
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 199 (4th Cir.1976) (findings of fact related to independence of evidence from immunized testimony will be overturned only if clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375, 376 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simon Curtis Tunstall v. Frank X. Hopkins, Nsp Warden Herbert Maschner, Isp Warden
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 194-195 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976); United States v. Pomponio, 517 F.2d 460, 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1015 , 96 S.Ct. 448 , 46 L.Ed.2d 386 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simon C. Tunstall v. Frank Hopkins
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 194-195 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed2d 375 (1976); United States v. Pomponio, 517 F.2d 460, 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. -17- 1015, 96 S.Ct. 448 , 46 L.Ed.2d 386 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McHan
See State v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 199 (4th Cir.) (findings of fact related to inde- pendence of evidence from immunized testimony will be upset only if clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHan
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 199 (4th Cir.) (findings of fact related to independence of evidence from immunized testimony will be upset only if clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375, 376 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Neal Colvard
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 196 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. State
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 204 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976) and Ramsey v. State, 239 Md. 561, 565 , 212 A.2d 319, 321 (1965) (both applying harmless error to admission of arguably impermissible hearsay statement); Vandegrift v. State, 82 Md.App. 617, 636-37 , 573 A.2d 56, 65 , cert. denied, 320 Md. 801 , 580 A.2d 219 (1990) (concluding that curative instruction dispelled any prejudice to defendant from admission of hearsay).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lorraine Furtado
See United States v. Garner, 529 F.2d 962, 969 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nichols
See United States v. Stewart (6th Cir. 1975), 531 F.2d 326, 336-37 , cert. denied., 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 , (1976); United States v. Bowdach (5th Cir. 1977), 561 F.2d 1160, 1175 ; United States v. Neary (7th Cir. 1977), 552 F.2d 1184, 1194 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 864 , 98 S.Ct. 197 , 54 L.Ed.2d 139 (1977); United States v. Warme (2d Cir. 1978) 572 F.2d 57, 62 , cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1011 , 98 S.Ct. 1885 , 56 L.Ed.2d 658 , 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 580 , 58 L.Ed.2d 658 (1978); United States v. Cox (8th Cir. 1983), 719 F. 2d 285 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 929 , 104 S.Ct. 17…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Ruben Soto
(2×)
United States v. Felder, 706 F.2d 135, 137-38 (3d Cir.1983); see United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326, 331 (6th Cir.) (power of review unrestricted), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976). 14 A. Adequacy of Notice of Dangerous Special Offender Proceeding 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nathaniel Pleasant
See United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976); United States v. Neary, 552 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 864 , 98 S.Ct. 197 , 54 L.Ed.2d 139 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Augustus Broome, United States of America v. James Lee Spoone, United States of America v. Billie K. Spoone
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. C.L. Childress
See United States v. Nelson, 529 F.2d 40 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2631 , 49 L.Ed.2d 377 (1976); United States v. Carter, 528 F.2d 844 (8th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 961 , 96 S.Ct. 1745 , 48 L.Ed.2d 206 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Cabbell v. United States
See United States v. White, 524 F.2d 1249, 1254 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louie Co Gunter
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 213 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis Humphrey
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 203 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
27 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 80,367, 6 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 696 United States of America v. Ottavio F. Grande, United States of America v. Gerald W. Berg, A/K/A Buzz Berg, United States of America v. Andrew Hawthorne, United States of America v. Edgar Hawthorne, United States of America v. Pietro Castagna, A/K/A Peter Castagna
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 194-95 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976). 19 E.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grande
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 194-95 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Mallott v. State
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 193 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
David O. Hampton v. Donald Wyrick, Warden, John Ashcroft, Attorney General, State of Missouri
Accord, United States v. Nelson, 529 F.2d 40, 42 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2631 , 49 L.Ed.2d 377 (1976); United States v. Carter, 528 F.2d 844, 848-49 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 961 , 96 S.Ct. 1745 , 48 L.Ed.2d 206 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustine Ybarra Ortiz
See United States v. White, 524 F.2d 1249 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Harold Hood
See United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 194-195 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976); United States v. Pomponio, 517 F.2d 460, 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1015 , 96 S.Ct. 448 , 46 L.Ed.2d 386 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Lawrence Squires
See, United States v. White, 524 F.2d 1249, 1253-54 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976); Popeko v. United States, 513 F.2d 771, 773 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 225 , 46 L.Ed.2d 146 (1975); Amer v. United States, 367 F.2d 803, 805 (8th Cir. 1966). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fatico
See United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326, 332 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976). “[T]he Act provides far more due process protection for a convicted offender at a hearing on an enhanced sentence than is required in normal criminal prosecutions in either state or federal jurisdictions . .” United States v. Ila-qua, 562 F.2d 399 , 403 n.7 (6th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dorothy Taylor
See also United States v. Dawson, 790 F.2d 1565 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 111 , 98 L.Ed.2d 71 (1987), and United States v. White, 524 F.2d 1249 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976), indicating that each of Taylor’s forgeries or passings was a separate offense. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elbert Ronald Boone and Pecolia Anne Boone
See also United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 213 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375, 376 (1976). (“If, as it appears, this was an ex parte interview [by the trial judge], without the presence of defense counsel, the latter knew of the incident and raised no objection at any time [then] this is at best harmless error.” (quoting United States v. Doe, 513 F.2d 709 , 710 n. 1 (1st Cir.1975)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Envirotech Corp.
See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 193 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976); United States v. Caesar, 368 F.Supp. 328, 335 (E.D.Wis. 1975); aff’d sub. nom., United States v. Hardin, 519 F.2d 1405 (7th Cir. 1975); City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., 538 F.Supp. 1240, 1253 (E.D. *366 Ohio, 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Felix
Compare United States v Stewart (531 F2d 326, 332, cert den 426 US 922 ; see Ann., 41 ALR Fed 576) holding that the Federal dangerous special offender statute (US Code, tit 18, § 3575), which permits imposition of an increased sentence after a finding on the basis of a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is such an offender, does not involve a new criminal charge. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James T. Schell
(2×)
Compare United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160, 1172-75 (5th Cir. 1977) (Specht due process principles apply to section 3575 proceedings) with United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326, 332 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976) (Specht due process principles do not apply to section 3575 proceedings).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hilda Hegger, of the Estate of Fred P. Hegger, Plaintiff-Appellee v. George E. Green, and St. Luke's Hospital Center, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee
(2×)
Compare Galard v. Johnson, 504 F.2d 1198 , 1200 n.1 (7th Cir. 1974) and Nodak Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 533 F.2d 401, 410 (8th Cir. 1976) (in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law) with Index Fund v. Insurance Co. of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1163 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979) (same issue left undecided) and Mehra v. Bentz, 529 F.2d 1137 , 1139 n.2a (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2628 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976) (assuming without decidin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cavanaugh v. Crist
See also United States v. Stewart (6th Cir. 1976), 531 F.2d 326 , cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 ; United States v. Holt (D.Tex. 1975), 397 F.Supp. 1397 , affirmed in part and vacated in part, (5th Cir. 1975), 537 F.2d 845 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1051 , 97 S.Ct. 764 , 50 L.Ed.2d 767 ; United States v. Neary (7th Cir. 1977), 552 F.2d 1184 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 864 , 98 S.Ct. 197 , 54 L.Ed.2d 139 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. State
See also United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326 (6th Cir.1976), cert. den., 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976); United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Warme, 572 F.2d 57 (2d Cir.1978), cert. den., 435 U.S. 1011 , 98 S.Ct. 1885 , 56 L.Ed.2d 393 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McMillan v. Marine Sulphur Shipping Corp.
See also Mehra v. Bentz, 529 F.2d 1137, 1139 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2628 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976) (under both New York and federal negligence law, “[i]f the circumstantial evidence presented lends itself equally to several conflicting inferences, the trier of the fact is not permitted to select the inference it prefers, since to do so would be the equivalent of engaging in pure speculation about the facts”); Prosser, Torts § 39 at 211 (4th ed. 1971). 5 Although the evidence of diligent maintenance and the results of the inspection of the aft spring line before…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Artez
Compare, United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 211 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976); United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752, 756 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 86 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Inendino
Compare United States v. Duardi, 384 F.Supp. 874 (W.D.Mo.1974), affirmed on other grounds, 529 F.2d 123 (8th Cir. 1975), with United States v. Stewart, 531 F.2d 326 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 376 (1976), and United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanders
See also United States v. Bowdach, 561 F2d 1160 (5th Cir 1977), and United States v. Stewart, 531 F2d 326 (6th Cir), cert den, 426 US 922 (1976). 4 Defendant was sentenced prior to the effective date of amended ORS 138.050 (October 4, 1977) which sets forth the present scope of sentence review.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitney
v.
Brann et vir.
v.
Brann et vir.
No. 75-1608.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.