green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Stovall v. United States
See Landmark, 256 F.3d at 1378 ; see generally N. Helex Co. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 862 , 524 F.2d 707, 714 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 146 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United States
See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 862 , 524 F.2d 707, 720-21 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 146 (1976) (indicating a party may not recover damages “if they are such as would have been realized by the party from other independent and collateral undertakings, although entered into in consequence and on the faith of the principal contract”) (quoting Myerle v. United States, 33 Ct.Cl. 1, 26 (1897)); see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. United States, 88 F.3d 1012, 1022-23 (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1245 , 137 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
See 15 U.S.C. § 717r(e). 5 See also Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) (order is final “unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); State of Louisiana v. Federal Power Comm’n, 483 F.2d 972 (5th Cir.1973) (neither application for rehearing, nor the institution of review in the Court of Appeals operates to stay a FERC order “unless such a stay is specifically ordered by the Commission or Court”); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969) (or…
discussed
Cited "see"
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Value Call International, Inc.
See Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm'n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 944 , 25 L.Ed.2d 118 (1970). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Utilicorp United Inc.
See Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 5 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976) (resolution of a matter before an administrative or judicial tribunal is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed); Panhandle v. Michigan Consolidated, No. 95-CV-70970-DT, slip op. at 5.
cited
Cited "see"
Mega Construction Co. v. United States
See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 862 , 524 F.2d 707, 714 (1975), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 146 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.
However, The Natural Gas Act directs that an application for a rehearing shall not operate as a stay of the Commission’s order unless specifically ordered by the Commission or by a reviewing Court of Appeals. 15 U.S.C. § 717r(c); see Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) (order is final “unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969) (commission’s orders effective during disposition of review proceedings),…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mid Louisiana Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Ecee, Inc. v. F.P.C., 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. F.P.C., 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 944 , 25 L.Ed.2d 118 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Northern Paiute Nation v. United States
See also, Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 862, 888 , 524 F.2d 707, 721 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 146 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Association Of Securities Dealers, Inc., Et Al.
See also Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, 526 F.2d 1270, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299, 302 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973). 19 Merrill Lynch contends that immediate review by the district court was appropriate in this case because the NASD's ruling subjected it to "irreparable injury." Merrill Lynch's claim of "irreparable injury" is based on two contentions: first, the ruling allowing Mrs. Heusinger to be present during the dis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.
See also Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, 526 F.2d 1270, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F.2d 299, 302 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ecee, Inc.
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 75-1502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.