green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman Mers, Lester Mers, Randy James Myers, Paul J. Ferrante
Accord United States v. Huntley, 535 F.2d 1400, 1406 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund
See generally, Solitron Devices, Inc. v. United States, 537 F.2d 417, 423 (Ct.Cl.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kidwell v. Meikle
See Daley v. Matthews, 536 F.2d 519, 522 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977) (ripeness doctrine particularly applicable to challenges to agency action); Webster v. Mesa, 521 F.2d 442, 444 (9th Cir. 1975) (refusing to hear challenge to election qualification statute on ground that no candidate had ever been disqualified thereunder).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kidwell v. Meikle
See Daley v. Matthews, 536 F.2d 519, 522 (2d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977) (ripeness doctrine particularly applicable to challenges to agency action); Webster v. Mesa, 521 F.2d 442, 444 (9th Cir. 1975) (refusing to hear challenge to election qualification statute on ground that no candidate had ever been disqualified thereunder). 97 Plaintiffs argue that under a balancing test, the harm caused by delay would outweigh the harm in proceeding immediately with the mandamus claims, and, thus, those claims are ripe.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liberty Cable Co., Inc. v. City of New York
See, e.g., Daley v. Weinberger, 400 F.Supp. 1288, 1291 (E.D.N.Y.1975) (holding that physician’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the FDA from inspecting her office not yet ripe where there was “no final agency action whose legality the court may pass upon” and noting that the “court is reluctant to anticipate what future action, if any, FDA may decide to take”), aff'd, 536 F.2d 519 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977). 27 *206 Despite Liberty’s April 7, 1992 submission to the FCC agreeing that “the [Beach] Petiti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. N. John Fontana, II
See also United States v. Huntley, 535 F.2d 1400 (5 Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1548 , 51 L.Ed.2d 773 (1977) (use of name other than that of actual person involved in transaction is ground for conviction); United States v. Metcalf, 388 F.2d 440 (4 Cir.1968) (check on individual account opened in fictitious name).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daley
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 76-686.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.