green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Huff v. State
See United States v. Peden, 556 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.) (concluding that admission of business records did not offend defendant's confrontation rights because, although defendant was not able to cross-examine person making records, defendant had opportunily to cross-examine records custodian), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977); see also United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941, 947 (5th Cir.) (no abuse of discretion in admitting Master Charge tickets where records custodian testified about how records were handled by bank), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 32…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud
See United States v. Peden, 556 F.2d 278 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977); see also E.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
See United States v. Peden, 556 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dafro M. JEFFERIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Theriault v. Silber, 547 F.2d 1279, 1280-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977); Armstrong v. Collier, 536 F.2d 72, 77 (5th Cir. 1976); Mladinich v. United States, 371 F.2d 940 (5th Cir. 1967). 5 Therefore, we vacate the por *1032 tion of the district court’s opinion which held that Jefferies failed to prove sex discrimination in promotion and remand to the district court for further findings of fact and conclusions of law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Austin
Compare United States v. Peden, 556 F.2d 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977) (no violation of confrontation clause where records were purely factual in nature, there were indicia of trustworthiness, and the custodian was available for cross-examination at trial) with United States v. King, 613 F.2d 670 (7th Cir.1980) (no violation of confrontation clause where maker of record, available for cross-examination at trial, could not remember details of interviews during which record made).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Theriault
v.
Silber
v.
Silber
No. 77-5283.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.