Cooper v. Maryland, 434 U.S. 926 (1977). · Go Syfert
Cooper v. Maryland, 434 U.S. 926 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Flores v. Stock (cacd, 1989-06-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Flores v. Stock
C.D. Cal. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ford v. Wainwright, 549 F.2d 981, 982-83 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 407 , 54 L.Ed.2d 284 (1977) (generally, the appropriate remedy for a due process violation occurring in the course of parole revocation proceedings is a new hearing, not outright release).
discussed Cited "see" Witzke v. Withrow
W.D. Mich. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
“The appropriate remedy for the denial of procedural due process protections in parole revocation hearings is to grant a new hearing.” Atkins v. Marshall, 533 *1355 F.Supp. 1324, 1329 (S.D.Ohio 1982); accord, Ford v. Wainwright, 549 F.2d 981, 982 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 407 , 54 L.Ed.2d 284 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Maryland
No. 77-5046.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1977.
434 U.S. 926
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.