green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 68 (4th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978) (if damages are capable of formula calculations, no manageability problem exists even though individual claims may exist); Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 5 (D.D.C.1992) (finding no manageability problem because the calculation of individual damages may be made by simple common formula); Walsh v. Pittsburgh Press Co., 160 F.R.D. 527, 531 (W.D.Pa.1994) (determination of amount of recovery for each employee class member will be based on a manageable …
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Butterworth
See generally Windham, v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 69 (4th Cir.1977) (finding that justification for class certification is absent “if a ‘test case’ approach will likely accomplish the same result under principles of collateral estoppel without involving the court in a morass of individual claims that will bog the court system down interminably.”), cer t. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 758-62 (3d Cir.) (discussing when the test case approach is superior to a class action), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see"
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 , 72 & n. 41 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Kline v. Coldwell Banker & Co., 508 F.2d 226, 233-34 (9th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goebel v. Colorado Department of Institutions
(2×)
Accord, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 67-70 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Bell
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Frazier, 560 F.2d 884, 887 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978) (“Proof of an attempt to arouse fear is sufficient proof of an attempted extortion under the Hobbs Act.”; citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Wayne McGinnis
The issue is one of voluntariness, see United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782, 793 (8th Cir.1980), and the appropriate inquiry is whether in light of all the circumstances McGinnis’s consent was not his own “essentially free and unconstrained choice” because “his will ha[d] been overborne and his capacity for self-determination critically impaired.” Schneckloth; 412 U.S. at 225 , 93 S.Ct. at 2046 ; see United States v. Frazier, 560 F.2d 884, 889 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 71-72 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Arthur Young & Co. v. United States District Court, 549 F.2d at 693 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wilcox Development Co. v. First Interstate Bank
Accord, Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martorano
See, United States v. Frazier, 560 F.2d 884 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mekani v. Miller Brewing Co.
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir. 1977) cert. den. 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Alabama v. Blue Bird Body Co., Inc., 573 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1978); American Custom Homes v. Detroit Lumberman’s Association, 91 F.R.D. 548 (E.D.Mich.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co.
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir. 1977) cert. denied 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Shumate & Co., Inc. v. National Assoc. of Securities Dealers, Inc., 17 F.R.Serv.2d 300 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen H. Marks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board
(2×)
See Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 , 68 and n. 28 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Ahgoom
See United States v. Brackett, 185 U.S.App.D.C. 394, 400 , 567 F.2d 501, 507 (1977) (MacKinnon, J., concurring), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saey v. Compusa, Inc.
See Morgan, 169 F.R.D. at 355 ; Rentschler v. Carnahan, 160 F.R.D. 114, 116 (E.D.Mo. 1995); see also Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 70 (4th Cir.1977) (en banc) (holding that, while the district court “should not decline to certify a class because it fears that insurmountable problems may later appear,” if the court finds “that there are serious problems now appearing, it should not certify the class merely on the assurance of counsel that some solution will be found.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978), quoted in Andre…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Industrial Diamonds Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Bogosian, 561 F.2d at 454-55 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klusman v. Bucks County Court of Common Pleas
See, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk A.G., 61 F.R.D. 427 (W.D.Mo.1973); Boshes v. General Motors Corporation, 59 F.R.D. 589 (N.D.Ill.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Haywood v. Barnes
See also Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
(2×)
See, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 65-72 (4th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Connell v. Citrus Bowl, Inc.
Class Certification As the case law demonstrates, private antitrust actions under the Robinson-Pat-man Act are generally if not always manifestly “ill-suited to class action treatment.” Kelly v. General Motors Corp., 425 F.Supp. 13 , 20 n. 7 (E.D.Pa.1976); see, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 65-66 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Mekani v. Miller Brewing Co., 93 F.R.D. 506, 511 (E.D.Mich.1982); Boro Hall v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co. Inc., 74 F.R.D. 142, 146 (E.D.N.Y.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 65 (4th Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roy Soto Puente v. United States
Compare Robinson and Hoyt, supra, with Lawary, supra (rejecting retroactivity in all cases), and United States v. Brackett, 567 F.2d 501 (D.C.Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978) (applying Dorszynski retroactively in cases of pending direct appeals but not in cases of collateral attack).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services Administration
(2×)
See also Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 71-72 (4th Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Screws Antitrust Litigation
Compare Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978); Hedges Enterprises, Inc. v. Continental Group, 81 F.R.D. 461, 474 (E.D.Pa.1979); In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 80 F.R.D. 244 (S.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rental Car of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Compare Windham v. American Brands, Inc., 565 F.2d 59, 65-66 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 968 , 98 S.Ct. 1605 , 56 L.Ed.2d 58 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Western Chain Co.
v.
Brownlee
v.
Brownlee
No. 77-978.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1978.
Published
App. Ct. 111., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.