green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wynn v. State
But cf. State v. Olmstead, 261 N.W.2d 880 (N.D.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978) (stipulated evidence admissible at hearing on motion for new trial); People v. Barbara, 400 Mich. 352 , 255 N.W.2d 171 (1977) (stipulated evidence admissible at post-conviction proceedings).
cited
Cited "see"
Sharp v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, *794 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Central Power and Light Co. v. Sharp
See Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Salmon River Canal Co. v. Bell Brand Ranches, Inc., 564 F.2d 1244, 1246 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Harding County v. South Dakota State Land Users Ass'n
See Fox v. Kneip, 260 N.W.2d 371 (S.D.1977), ce rt. denied 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company
See Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd. v. Bell Brand Ranches, 564 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978). 13 In any event, this case does not require us to determine the Engineer's obligations under Nevada law to consider issues such as alleged forfeiture or abandonment in a transfer application proceeding.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd. v. Bell Brand Ranches, 564 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 758 (1978). 13 In any event, this case does not require us to determine the Engineer’s obligations under Nevada law to consider issues such as alleged forfeiture or abandonment in a transfer application proceeding.
cited
Cited "see"
Deerfield Land Joint Venture v. Southern Union Realty Co.
See Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196,199 (Tex. Civ.App. — Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert, denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Bullock v. Amoco Production Co.
See Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r. e.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Padgett
See e.g., State v. Olmstead, 246 N.W.2d 888, 890 (N.D.1976), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McNabb v. Oregonian Publishing Co.
See, e.g., Widener v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 75 Cal App 3d 415, 142 Cal Rptr 304 (1977), cert den 436 US 918 (1978); Fopay v. Noveroske, 31 Ill App 3d 182, 334 NE2d 79 (1975); Wollman v. Graff, 287 NW2d 104 (SD 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gomes v. Fried
The ruling established that in a defamation action brought by a “public official,” the plaintiff must prove that the publication was false, and that the publication was with “actual malice,” defined as publishing “with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” (Id., at p. 280 [ 11 L.Ed.2d at p. 706 ]; see also Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975) 420 U.S 469, 490 [ 43 L.Ed.2d 328, 346 , 95 S.Ct. 1029 ].) On review we must determine whether the above principles were constitutionally applied, “but this does not involve a de novo review…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frisco Land & Mining Co.
v.
California
v.
California
No. 77-1386.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.