Frazier v. United States, 438 U.S. 909 (1978). · Go Syfert
Frazier v. United States, 438 U.S. 909 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Vinson (ohioctapp, 2021-03-18) · Strongest negative: State v. Yslas (ariz, 1984-01-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" State v. Yslas
Ariz. · 1984 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, State v. Shelton, 51 Ohio St.2d 68 , 364 N.E.2d 1152 (1977), vacated on other grounds 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978).
cited Cited "but see" State v. Yslas
Ariz. · 1984 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, State v. Shelton, 51 Ohio St.2d 68 , 364 N.E.2d 1152 (1977), vacated on other grounds 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978).
discussed Cited "but see" Fullilove v. Klutznick (2×)
SCOTUS · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
Feb. 9, 1978); Carolinas Branch, Associated General Contractors v. Kreps, 442 F. Supp. 392 (SC 1977); Ohio Contractors Assn. v. Economic Development Administration, 452 F. Supp. 1013 (SD Ohio 1977); Montana Contractors' Assn. v. Secretary of Commerce, 439 F. Supp. 1331 (Mont. 1977); Florida East Coast Chapter v. Secretary of Commerce , No. 77-8351 (SD Fla. Nov. 3, 1977); but see Associated General Contractors v. Secretary of Commerce, 441 F. Supp. 955 (CD Cal. 1977), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness, 438 U. S. 909 (1978), on remand, 459 F. Supp. 766 (CD Cal.), vacated and rem…
discussed Cited "but see" Fullilove v. Kreps
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Associated General Contractors v. Secretary of Commerce, 441 F.Supp. 955 (C.D.Cal.1977), vacated and remanded, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 3132 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978), which held the provision invalid. 15 ' That case reached the Supreme Court where it was remanded to the District Court for consideration of mootness.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Vinson
Ohio Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Downs, 51 Ohio St.2d 47, 64-65 (1977), vacated on other grounds, Downs v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 909 (1978) 5 In 2007, Crim.R. 41(E) provided: "The judge before whom the warrant is returned shall attach to the warrant a copy of the return, inventory, and all other papers in connection therewith and shall file them with the clerk." (Emphasis added.) No. 20AP-356 9 (noncompliance with Crim.R. 41 with respect to the return of a search warrant is merely an administrative error, and is not an error of constitutional magnitude); Columbus v. Wright, 48 Ohio App.3d 107 (10th Dist.1988) (Failure t…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Morse, Unpublished Decision (7-29-2002)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Downs (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 47 , 63-64 , vacated on death penalty grounds in 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 (search warrant not timely returned in violation of Crim.R. 41 was a nonconstitutional error in magnitude and evidence not excluded); State v. Sanders (May 20, 2002), Mahoning County No. 01-C.A. 14 (failure of search warrant to command that a search be completed within three days and the failure to return warrant within time constraints was a nonconstitutional violation not warranting exclusion).
discussed Cited "see" State v. McNeill
Ohio · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Downs (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 47, 61-62 , 5 O.O.3d 30, 38 , 364 N.E.2d 1140, 1149 , sentence vacated on other grounds, Downs v. Ohio (1978), 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. McNeill
Ohio · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Downs (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 47, 61-62 , 5 O.O.3d 30, 38 , 364 N.E.2d 1140, 1149 , sentence vacated on other grounds, Downs v. Ohio (1978), 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Helmick
W. Va. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although some courts hold that a conspiracy terminates for the purpose of the Rule 801(d)(2)(E) analysis “when the substantive crime for which the co-conspirators are being tried is either attained or defeated,” State v. Darby, 123 Ariz. 368, 372 , 599 P.2d 821, 825 (1979) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Smith, 520 F.2d 1245 (8th Cir.1975), we are persuaded by those jurisdictions that hold that “[a] conspiracy to commit a crime does not necessarily end with the commission of the crime.” Syllabus Point 1, State v. Shelton, 51 Ohio St.2d 68 , 364 N.E.2d 1152 (1977), vacated…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frazier
v.
United States
No. 77-6680.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1978.
438 U.S. 909
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 60.