green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“defendant's decision not to appeal cannot be fairly charged to his attorney”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ex Parte Dunn
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
defendant's decision not to appeal cannot be fairly charged to his attorney
cited
Cited "see"
Watson v. State
See Norris v. Wainwright , 588 F.2d 130 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Block v. State
See Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, *410 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Sibley v. State
See Norris v. Wain-wright, 588 F.2d 130 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darrell Windell Childs v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130, 137 (5th Cir.) (“A defendant properly informed of his appellant rights may not ‘let the matter rest,’ and then claim that he did not waive his right to appeal.” (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Joseph Hogan, A/K/A Hal Winter Michael Trupei
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Fratus, 530 F.2d 644, 647 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976); United States v. Stone, 472 F.2d 909, 913 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Gray, 421 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir.1970); see also United States v. Birdsell, 775 F.2d 645, 648 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1119 , 106 S.Ct. 1979 , 90 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Ray Piche, United States of America v. Lloyd Ray Piche
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 821 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Guillette, 547 F.2d 743, 749 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 839 , 98 *712 S.Ct. 132, 54 L.Ed.2d 102 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald G. Auen
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Theodore Robert Bundy v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Fratus, 530 F.2d 644, 647 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976); United States v. Stone, 472 F.2d 909, 913 (5th Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Gray, 421 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir.1970); see also United States v. Birdsell, 775 F.2d 645, 648 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1119 , 106 S.Ct. 1979 , 90 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pleasant
See State v. Lawrence, 365 So.2d 1356 (La.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Duane McKinney
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Angelini, 607 F.2d 1305,1308 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Pomares, 499 F.2d 1220, 1223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1032 , 95 S.Ct. 514 , 42 L.Ed.2d 307 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard L. Dankert v. Jim Wharton, Warden
See Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130, 132 (5th Cir.) 4 (“there is no constitutional right to an appointed counsel at a state habeas corpus action”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); Ardister v. Hopper, 500 F.2d 229, 233 (5th Cir.1974) (same); Stanley v. Wainwright, 406 F.2d 8, 10 (5th Cir.1969) (“there is no absolute constitutional right to counsel at post-conviction proceedings [in state court]”).
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Hopper
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 819 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darrell Windell CHILDS v. James A. COLLINS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130, 137 (5th Cir.) ("A defendant properly informed of his appellant rights may not "let the matter rest,' and then claim that he did not waive his right to appeal." (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Walker
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) ("[The plain-error rule] will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
KAPPMEYER v. State
See Angleton, 314 F.3d at 776 (“Collateral estoppel is inapplicable here, because the United States and Texas, as separate sovereigns, are not the ‘same party.’ ”); See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 819 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) (`Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial.'), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) (`Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial.'), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) ("Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gillis v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 817 (5th Cir.) (construing dual sovereignty doctrine broadly and noting the “well-established rule that there is no constitutional bar to successive state and federal prosecutions for the same criminal conduct” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Proctor
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); McFadden v. United States, 814 F.2d 144, 146 (3d Cir.1987); United States v. Lovelace, 683 F.2d 248 (7th Cir.1982); Chavez v. United States, 656 F.2d 512 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1349 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Don Micheaux v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
(2×)
See also Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130, 134 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); Lee v. Hopper, 499 F.2d 456, 462 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1053 , 95 S.Ct. 633 , 42 L.Ed.2d 650 (1974) (citations omitted) (“[s]ince the issues of effective assistance and voluntariness present mixed questions of law and fact, and since such questions do not fall within section 2254(d)’s presumption of correctness, the district court was under no constraint to defer to the state conclusions”). 6 Accordingly, the state court’s findings of “historical�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Beyer
See, e.g., Nor *439 ris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979) (deferring to state court fact finding that counsel suggested that petitioner appeal but petitioner had refused).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Troy Lee Shearer
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 824 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Muscarella, 585 F.2d 242, 252 (7th Cir.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Leeke
v.
Leeke
No. 78-6565.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Alabama (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.