green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Itt Rayonier, Incorporated
But see, Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 (2d *1002 Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979) (Title VII suit barred when issues decided adversely to plaintiff in prior state proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
Twinam v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir.1977) (concluding any abuse of discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to amend his answer was harmless because “[n]one of the matters set forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result”).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation"
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata ), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir. 1977) (concluding any abuse of discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to amend his answer was harmless because "[n]one of the matters set forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result").
discussed
Cited "see"
Evelyn Deloris Bray v. New York Life Insurance
Accord Sinicropi v. Nassau Cty., 601 F.2d 60 , 62 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (where adverse determination of plaintiff’s discrimination claim by the NYSDHR and the *63 New York State Human Rights Appeals Board was affirmed by the New York Appellate Division, Title YII claim barred by res judicata), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Bonner
See, Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); Gear v. City of Des Moines, 514 F.Supp. 1218, 1224 (S.D.Iowa 1981). 8 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver v. Mohasco Corp.
Id. pp. 462-463, 476, 102 S.Ct. pp. 1887-88, 1894; see also Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carey
v.
Leverette, Warden
v.
Leverette, Warden
No. 79-5505.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1979.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.