Millican v. United States, 445 U.S. 915 (1980). · Go Syfert
Millican v. United States, 445 U.S. 915 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the point simply is that there must have been presented, within the time limit, by or on behalf of the creditor, some written instrument which brings to the attention of the court the nature and amount of the claim.”
69 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 40 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dicker v. Dye (In Re Edelman) (bap9, 1999-07-29) · Strongest negative: United States v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., United States of America v. Duncan Ceramics, Inc., a Corporation (ca9, 1981-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., United States of America v. Duncan Ceramics, Inc., a Corporation
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. United States v. Millican, 600 F.2d 273, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1979) (holding that a summons is sufficient restraint to invoke probable cause requirement, where failure to appear on summons may result in issuance of warrant), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980). 5 .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dicker v. Dye (In Re Edelman)
9th Cir. BAP · 1999 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
franciscan vineyards
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Roosevelt Green, Jr. v. Walter D. Zant
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
is this your verdict and the verdict of the jury?
examined Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Modular Engineering Corp.
Bankr. S.D. Tex. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the point simply is that there must have been presented, within the time limit, by or on behalf of the creditor, some written instrument which brings to the attention of the court the nature and amount of the claim.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Hayes
Bankr. C.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Holm, 931 F.2d at 622 ; see County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. (In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc.), 597 F.2d 181, 183 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980) (holding that an informal proof of claim need not appear on the bankruptcy court’s records or in its files); Sambo’s Restaurants, Inc. v. Wheeler (In re Sambo’s Restaurants, Inc.), 754 F.2d 811 , 816 *461 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that a creditor’s attempt to transfer a pending state court action to the bankruptcy court “demonstrated her intent to file her proof of claim with th…
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Mansfield & Tire Rubber Co., Inc.
Bankr. N.D. Ohio · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980); In re Sambo’s Restaurants, 754 F.2d 811 (9th Cir.1985); In re Evanston Motors, Inc., 735 F.2d 1029 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Anderson-Walker Industries, Inc., Debtor. Anderson-Walker Industries, Inc. And John P. Stodd, Trustee v. Lafayette Metals, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181, 182-83 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (Franciscan Vinyards), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980); Sun Basin Lumber Co. v. United States, 432 F.2d 48, 49-50 (9th Cir.1970) (per curiam) (Sun Bar sin).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Johnson
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
Menick v. Hoffman, 205 F.2d 365, 368 (9th Cir.1953); In re Diversified Brokers Co., Inc., 355 F.Supp. 76, 78 (E.D.Mo.), aff'd, 487 F.2d 355 (8th Cir.1973); In re Western Trading Co., 340 F.Supp. 1130, 1133 (D.Nev.1972); Matter of Saxe, 14 B.R. 161, 164 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1981) and cases cited therein; see In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181, 183 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Levine v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood (In Re Evanston Motor Co.) (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
N.D. Ill. · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181, 183 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980); National Bank v. Wurlitzer Co., 315 F.2d 210, 214-15 (2d Cir.1963) (In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd.); Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. London Art Furniture Corp., 181 F.2d 747, 750 (2d Cir.1950) (In re High Point Seating Co.); Tarbell v. Crex Carpet Co., 90 F.2d 683, 685 (8th Cir.1937); Lacoe v. DeLong, 65 F.2d 82, 83 (2d Cir.1933) (In re Hotel St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harden v. Texas Department of Transportation (In Re Aer-Aerotron, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.C. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181, 182-83 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980) (interpreting the Note of the Advisory Committee on the Bankruptcy Rules to find that exception for “erroneous” fifing in Rule 5005(c) is recognized regardless of any intent to file with the court).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Gateway Investments Corp.
Bankr. S.D. Florida · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 *788 (1980); Sun Basin Lumber Co. v. United States, 432 F.2d 48 (9th Cir.1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kenison
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Gerstein, supra, 420 U.S. [103, at 119, 125 n. 26, 95 S.Ct. 854, 865 , 869 n. 26, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 ] ..., (probable cause determination is "not a prerequisite to prosecution by information," and "is required only for those suspects who suffer restraints on liberty other than the condition that they appear for trial."); United States v. Birkenstock, 823 F. 2d 1026 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Bohrer, 807 F. 2d 159 (10th Cir.1986) (United States Constitution requires no showing of probable cause when a summons instead of a warrant issues on an information for an Internal Revenue Code violation)…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Sherret
Bankr. W.D. La. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In re Francisian Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181 (9th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 , holding that for documents to constitute an infor mal proof of claim, they must state an explicit demand showing the nature, and amount of the claim against the estate and evidence an intent to hold the debtor liable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Millican
v.
United States
No. 79-729.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1980.
445 U.S. 915

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.