green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Ray v. Kernan
See United States v. Tsinnijinnie, 601 F.2d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James
See United States v. Tsinnijinnie, 601 F.2d 1035 (9th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Ralph Henderson
See Ruff v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 915, 918 (9th Cir.1990) (“ ‘This panel is not bound by dicta from prior cases....”’) (quoting United States v. Tsinnijinnie, 601 F.2d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick v. Burget
See Straube v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board, 287 Or. 375 , 600 P.2d 381, 386-87 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980); Huffaker v. Bailey, 273 Or. 273 , 540 P.2d 1398, 1401 (1975); see also Or.Rev.Stat. 41.675(5) (rule that peer review proceedings confidential inapplicable in judicial proceedings challenging adverse privilege decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick v. Burget
See Straube v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board, 287 Or. 375 , 600 P.2d 381, 386-87 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980); Huffaker v. Bailey, 273 Or. 273 , 540 P.2d 1398, 1401 (1975); see also Or.Rev.Stat. 41.675(5) (rule that peer review proceedings confidential inapplicable in judicial proceedings challenging adverse privilege decision).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
MacArthur v. San Juan County
See, e.g., Straube v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Bd., 287 Or. 375 , 600 P.2d 381 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Magrinat v. Trinity Hospital
Everett v. Franciscan Sisters *630 Healthcare, Inc., 882 F.2d at 1386 (“questions regarding medical treatment ... and kindred matters, are not suitable for determination by juristic science”); see also Straube v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board, 287 Or. 375 , 600 P.2d 381, 386 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bradshaw
See, e.g., United States v. Tsinnijinnie, 601 F.2d 1035, 1037-39 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1657 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980) (marital privilege "should not be extended to bar a witness from relating an excited utterance by a spouse”); United States v. Chapman, 866 F.2d 1326, 1333 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 932 , 110 S.Ct. 321 , 107 L.Ed.2d 312 (1989) (spousal extrajudicial statements are not excluda-ble on the basis of spousal privilege).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexander
v.
Perini, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Perini, Correctional Superintendent
No. 79-5916.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1980.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.