Rado v. Connecticut, 447 U.S. 920 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Rado v. Connecticut, 447 U.S. 920 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 · …hall was available for effective cross-examination concerning the veracity of his extrajudicial statement ⚠ not in text
52 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop (ca2, 1983-01-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop (2×)
2d Cir. · 1983 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
hall was available for effective cross-examination concerning the veracity of his extrajudicial statement
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gallego
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Neftali Perez v. Everett Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979) (citing Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179 , 83 S.Ct. 1151 , 10 L.Ed.2d 278 (1963)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1186 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Moosman
Utah · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Rado v. State of Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980). 24 . 806 F.2d 39 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1020 , 107 S.Ct. 1903 , 95 L.Ed.2d 509 (1989). 25 .
cited Cited "see" Merriweather v. Hercules, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burdine v. Texas Department of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 566 (5th Cir.1979), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
cited Cited "see" 26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 733, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,389 Clarence Merriweather, Charles H. Hood and Vallie J. Cunningham, Cross v. Hercules, Incorporated, Hercules, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burdine v. Texas Department of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 566 (5th Cir.1979), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1610, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,247, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1409 Mariano S. Falcon, Cross-Appellant v. General Telephone Company of the Southwest, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 567 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980). 51 In fact, General did put forth the explanation that the people hired for the positions Falcon wanted were more qualified than he was. 10 Through statistical evidence, the Company also showed that Falcon had received three promotions in seven years of employment with General, an average of 0.43 promotions a year, while the average white worker at General received only .20 promotions per year.
cited Cited "see" Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas
N.D. Tex. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563 , 569 n.14 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S. Ct. 3009 , 65 L.
cited Cited "see" Falcon v. General Telephone Co. of the Southwest
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 567 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted-U.S.-, 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnold v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See McBride v. State, 477 A.2d 174, 187 (Del.1984) ("the State has a right to call a witness to the stand to testify as to relevant matters of which he has knowledge" (citations omitted)); see also Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 649 (6th Cir.) ("the government has the obligation to present such relevant testimony as the witness may possess"), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975). [17] This case is not comparable to those in which cour…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Washington v. Kroger Co.
W.D. Mo. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Burdine v. Texas Department of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); East v. Romine, Inc., 518 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pouncy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
S.D. Tex. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 567 (5th Cir. 1979) cert. granted, ---- U.S.---, 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980) (legally sufficient proof is required) (emphasis in original); accord, Crawford v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 614 F.2d 1300, 1320 (5th Cir. 1980) (citing Turner); but see, Tortorici v. Harris, 610 F.2d 278 , 279 at n.1 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam) (“We do not decide what level of proof constitutes a sufficient rebuttal after Fumco . . . .”). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rado
v.
Connecticut
No. 79-1333.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
447 U.S. 920
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.