green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
“the securities laws, while their central insistence is upon disclosure, were never intended to attempt any such measures of psychoanalysis or preported (sic) self-analysis.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loretta Burrell
in most cases motions to try different counts separately have been denied.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.
(2×)
the securities laws, while their central insistence is upon disclosure, were never intended to attempt any such measures of psychoanalysis or preported (sic) self-analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nitin Shah
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615 , 620 n. 17 (5th Cir.1979) (ruling that the statement was in effect false even if literally true), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Huntsman and Ralph Huntsman
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 619-20 (5th Cir.1979) (evidence of sham nature of transactions sufficient to show individuals not entitled to receive government benefits, and thus statements to the contrary were false, even though paper structure indicated that the individuals were entitled), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith A. Brink
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 623 (5th Cir.), modified on other grounds on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied,- U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NITIN SHAH
See United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615 , 620 n.17 (5th Cir. 1979) (ruling that the statement was in effect false even if literally true), cert. denied, 101 S.Ct. 120 (1980). 12 Section 714m(a) prohibits the making of false statements for the purpose of influencing the Commodity Credit Corporation. 14 promises as to the future a criminal offense . . ., it would have made express provision therefore as it did in 18 U.S.C. § 1341 [the mail fraud statute] . . . ." Id. at 603 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paving Equipment of the Carolinas Inc. v. M & N Development Co.
See Jackson v. Bi-Lo Stores, Inc., — S.C. -, 437 S.E.2d 168 (1993), citing Berkebile v. Outen, 311 S.C. 50 , 426 S.E.2d 760, 762 (1993); see also, Urbatec v. Yuma County, 614 F.2d 1216, 1217 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 49 (1980) (construing a similar Arizona statute as being a bar to actions by unlicensed contractors); and, Brady v. Fulghum, 309 N.C. 580 , 308 S.E.2d 327 (1983) (adopting the rule that contract illegally entered into by unlicensed contractor is unenforceable by the contractor); Mill-Pow er Supply Co. v. CVM Associates, 85 N.C.App. 455, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Vasquez
(2×)
United States v. Tedder, 787 F.2d 540 , 542 nn. 2-3 (10th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Strand, 617 F.2d 571, 578 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). 26 The failure to file a transcript also precludes review of the trial court's evidentiary rulings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Steven Phillips and Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., United States of America v. Robert Jay Meinster, A/K/A \Robby\"
Robison, 644 F.2d at 1272 . 71 For a thorough discussion of Blackledge, Jackson, and Hardwick, see Miracle v. Estelle, 592 F.2d 1269 (5th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 624 (5th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), on appeal after remand, 617 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980) 72 Moreover, at no time did the government inform Myers that he would not be prosecuted on a continuing criminal enterprise count.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
For a thorough discussion of Blackledge, Jackson, and Hardwick, see Miracle v. Estelle, 592 F.2d 1269 (5th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 624 (5th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 604 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1979), on appeal after remand, 617 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hammett
v.
Rockwell International Corp.
v.
Rockwell International Corp.
No. 79-2020.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2) · Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.