green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 ·
…malice aforethought may be implied from such an intent
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reginald Lannon v. William Hogan
(2×)
malice aforethought may be implied from such an intent
discussed
Cited "see"
Escoto-Lugo v. United States
The error must ‘resent exceptional circumstances wher the need for the remedy afforded by the writ of habeas corpus is apparent.’ Id. (quoting Bowen v. Johnston, 306 U.S. 19, 27 , 59 S.Ct. 442, 446 , 83 L.Ed. 455 (1939); see Fasano v. Hall, 615 F.2d. 555, 557 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d. 86 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pethel v. McBride
(2×)
See, Fasano v. Hall, 615 F.2d 555, 558 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980) (violations of IAD are not “fundamental defects” indicating a “miscarriage of justice” so as to be cognizable in federal habeas proceeding); Reilly v. Warden, FCI Petersburg, 947 F.2d 43, 44 (2nd Cir.1991) (per curiam), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1115 , 112 S.Ct. 1227 , 117 L.Ed.2d 462 (1992), (violation of IAD not basis for federal habeas relief); Browning v. Foltz, 837 F.2d 276, 283 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1018 , 109 S.Ct. 816 , 102 L.Ed.2d 805 (1989) (v…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Grigsby
See McInerney v. Berman, 621 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d 85 (1980); Franklin, 471 U.S. at 314-315 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 (citing Allen, 442 U.S. at 157-63 , 99 S.Ct. 2213 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Christopher Martens v. James Shannon, Attorney General
See Fasano v. Hall, 615 F.2d 555, 558 (1st Cir.) (claimed IAD violations "generally not cognizable in a habeas proceeding”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980».
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milton Wayne Seymore v. State of Alabama, Leoneal Davis, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama
See, e.g., Fasano v. Hall, 615 F.2d 555, 558 (1st Cir.) (alleged violation of Article III's speedy trial provision and other alleged lAD violations un-cognizable under section 2254 because violations are "not `fundamental defects' indicating a `miscarriage of justice' "), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 , 66 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); Edwards v. United States, 564 F.2d 652, 654 (2d Cir.1977) (per curiam) (alleged violation of Article IV's anti-shuttling provision uncognizable under section 2255 because violation did not re-suit "in a complete miscarriage of justice"); Kerr v. Finkbeiner, 75…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. State
See also Fasano v. Hall, 476 F.Supp. 291 (D.Mass. 1979), aff'd on other grounds, 615 F.2d 555 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 867 , 101 S.Ct. 201 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fasano
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 79-6877.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Cited by 35 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.