Control Data Corp. v. Potter Instrument Co., 449 U.S. 1022 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Control Data Corp. v. Potter Instrument Co., 449 U.S. 1022 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tompkins v. Cyr (txnd, 1998-01-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Tompkins v. Cyr
N.D. Tex. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dep’t of Probation, 632 F.2d 938, 941 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980); United States v. Lampley, 573 F.2d 783, 787 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see" Raymond Wayne Hill v. The City of Houston, Texas (2×)
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation, 632 F.2d 938 , 942 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980); Walker v. Dillard, 523 F.2d 3, 6 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 906 , 96 S.Ct. 208 , 46 L.Ed.2d 136 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See 101 S.Ct. 591 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. SCOTT LaFONTAINE
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
The statute proscribes conduct, *557 not the content of the telephone calls.”); State v. Anonymous (1978-4), 34 Conn. Sup. 689 , 696, 389 A.2d 1270 (1978) (“it is the manner and means employed to communicate [the messages] which is the subject of the prohibition rather than their content”); see also Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dept. of Probation, 632 F.2d 938 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S. Ct. 591 , 66 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Charles
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 830 (1973); see also Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dept. of Probation, 632 F.2d 938 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S. Ct. 591 , 66 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Murphy
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
General Statutes § 53a-183 (a) (2) prohibits communications by mail that are made “with intent to harass, annoy or alarm” and “in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm . . . .” Thus, § 53a-183 (a) (2) proscribes harassing conduct via mail and does not seek to regulate the content of communications made by mail. 16 State v. Snyder, 49 Conn. App. 617, 625 , 717 A.2d 240 (1998); see also Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dept. of Probation, 632 F.2d 938, 942 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S. Ct. 591 , 66 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Hendrickson
Pa. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gormley v. Director, Conn. State Dep't of Probation, 632 F.2d 938 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980); State v. Richards, 127 Idaho 31 , 896 P.2d 357 (1995); McKillop v. State, 857 P.2d 358 (Alaska App.1993); People v. Hernandez, 231 Cal.App.3d 1376 , 283 Cal.Rptr. 81 (1991). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roesch, No. Cr94-87735 (Jun. 6, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cox v. Louisiana, supra; Giboney v. Empire Storage Ice Co., supra; State v. Culmo, supra, 73; see Mozzochi v. Borden, supra, 1175 (criminal prosecution in response to threatening behavior is not repugnant to the first amendment); see also Gormley v. Director, 632 F.2d 938 , 942 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980) ( first amendment violation not established where speech is not a component of the statutory violation).
cited Cited "see, e.g." McKillop v. State
Alaska Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Gormley v. Director, Connecticut Dept. of Probation, 632 F.2d 938, 942 (2nd Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 ; State v. Gattis, 730 P.2d at 502 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lawrence Shackelford v. Jack Shirley, Sheriff, Lee County, Mississippi
5th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Likewise, the court in United States v. Lampley, 573 F.2d 783 (3d Cir.1978), in upholding the federal telephone harassment statute, 47 U.S.C. § 223 , against constitutional attack, noted that the statute’s “narrow intent requirement precludes the proscription of mere communication.” Id. at 787; see also Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dep’t of Probation, 632 F.2d 938, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980) (rejecting first amendment challenge to Connecticut telephone harassment statute in habeas corpus appeal); State v. Thompson, 701 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Thorne (2×)
W. Va. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Anonymous, 34 Conn.Supp. 689 , 389 A.2d 1270 , appeal denied, 174 Conn. 803 , 382 A.2d 1332 (1978), denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus aff'd, Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Dept. of Probation, 632 F.2d 938 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S.Ct. 591 , 66 L.Ed.2d 485 (1980); Von Lusch v. State, 39 Md.App. 517 , 387 A.2d 306 (1978); People v. Taravella, 133 Mich.App. 515 , 350 N.W.2d 780 (1984); State v. Camp, 59 N.C.App. 38 , 295 S.E.2d 766 , appeal dismissed, 307 N.C. 271 , 299 S.E.2d 216 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bellamy
Conn. App. Ct. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 124 (1971); see also Gormley v. Connecticut Department of Adult Probation, 632 F.2d 938 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1023 , 101 S. Ct. 591 , 66 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Control Data Corp.
v.
Potter Instrument Co.
No. 80-561.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
449 U.S. 1022
Because, Below, Conflict, Courts, From, Judgments, White.
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White dissents from the denial of certiorari because the judgment below is in conflict with the judgments of other Courts of Appeals.

E. g., Martinez v. Trainor, 556 F. 2d 818, 821 (CA7 1977); Jusino v. Morales & Tio, 139 F. 2d 946 (CA1 1944); Virginia Land Co. v. Miami Shipbuilding Corp., 201 F. 2d 506 (CA5 1953).