green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization
(Coca-Cola Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 25 Cal. 2d at p. 922 ; see Industrial Welfare Com. v. Superior Court (1980) 27 Cal.3d 690, 708-709 [ 166 Cal.Rptr. 331 , 613 P.2d 579 ], app. dism., cert. den., 449 U.S. 1029 [ 66 L.Ed.2d 492 , 101 S.Ct. 602 ].) Faced with these facts and presumptions and the lack of any evidence of legislative intent tending to support Trailer Train’s contention, we conclude that the Legislature intended that flatcars be included within the scope of the PRCTL.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement System
(Rivera v. Division of Industrial Welfare (1968) 265 Cal.App.2d 576, 602-605 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 739 ] [Industrial Welfare Commission orders regulating minimum wages, maximum hours and working conditions of women and minors in agricultural occupations not preempted].) FLSA expressly provides that none of its provisions shall excuse “noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a . . . maximum workweek lower than the maximum workweek established under this chapter . . . .” ( 29 U.S.C. § 218 (a).) As noted in Rivera, FLSA’s section 218 is a statement of feder…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Butcher
v.
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Hennefer, Real Parties in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Hennefer, Real Parties in Interest)
No. 80-551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1980.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.