green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.3 score
“as a general rule the unavailability of an irreplaceable juror makes a mistrial manifestly necessary”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. United States
as a general rule the unavailability of an irreplaceable juror makes a mistrial manifestly necessary
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jeffrey Lovinger v. Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit, Lake County, Illinois, Respondent
defense counsel did not object to the order of mistrial, despite adequate opportunity to do so.
discussed
Cited "see"
Theodore A. Weston v. Peg Kernan, Warden
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350, 351-52 (9th Cir.1980) (defense counsel’s failure to object to mistrial amounted to implied consent), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 818 (1981); United States v. Bates, 917 F.2d 388, 393 (9th Cir.1990) (no consent when defendant has no opportunity to object to a mistrial declared sua sponte by the state trial judge).
discussed
Cited "see"
Camden v. Circuit Court
See United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350 , 352 n. 2 (9th Cir.1980) (defense counsel's statements and silences after declaration of mistrial but before discharge of jury constituted implied consent), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United States v. Estremera, 531 F.2d 1103, 1109-10 (2d Cir.) (The trial court granted defendant's mistrial motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Camden v. Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit
See United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350 , 352 n. 2 (9th Cir.1980) (defense counsel's statements and silences after declaration of mistrial but before discharge of jury constituted implied consent), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United States v. Estremera, 531 F.2d 1103, 1109-10 (2d Cir.) (The trial court granted defendant’s mistrial motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350, 351 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981). 96 The mistrial exceptions to the double jeopardy bar clearly refute the notion that the bar is absolute.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. United States
Accord United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350, 351 (9th Cir.1980) (implied consent, like express consent, removes double jeopardy bar to retrial), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United States v. Beckerman, 516 F.2d 905, 909 (2d Cir.1975) *1301 (“Although the defense was not totally still, it was silent on the prospect of a mistrial and nothing was said to dispel the inference of accord”); United States v. Goldman, 439 F.Supp. 358, 360 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (consent need not be express but may be implied), aff'd mem., 573 F.2d 1297 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peters v. Quick
See United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United States v. Potash, 118 F.2d 54 (2d Cir.1941); see also Dunkerley v. Hogan, 579 F.2d 141 , 148 n. 7 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1090 , 99 S.Ct. 872 , 59 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); People v. Portalatin, 105 Misc.2d 725 , 433 N.Y.S.2d 57, 58 (Queens County 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Washington
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350, 352 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United States v. Goldstein, 479 F.2d 1061, 1067 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 873 , 94 S.Ct. 151 , 38 L.Ed.2d 113 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robyn Dipietro
See also, United States v. Smith, 621 F.2d 350, 352 (9th Cir.1980) (consent implied where, after court declared mistrial sua sponte, defense counsel did not object but engaged in planning for new trial), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1087 , 101 S.Ct. 877 , 66 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981). 22 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yost
v.
Bordenkircher, Warden
v.
Bordenkircher, Warden
No. 80-5531.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1) · District of Columbia Court of … (1)
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.