Hill v. United States, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Hill v. United States, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 · …no warrant is involved here, hence nothing that we say applies to factual situations where one has been obtained. ⚠ not in text
175 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 47 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Vaughan
D. Mass. · 1995 · signal: accord · confidence high
The purpose of the judicially created exclusionary rule “is to deter police misconduct by eliminating the incentive for police officers to disregard constitutional requirements on the chance that they may turn up evidence which would incriminate a defen *47 dant.” United States v. Aiudi, 835 F.2d 943, 945 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 1273 , 99 L.Ed.2d 484 (1988); accord United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 841 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981) (the exclusionary rule is “judge-made” and “justified ... only…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dorsey
cma · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Farber, 630 F.2d 569, 571 (8th Cir.1980) (In prosecution for failing to file income tax return in 1974, “tax documents which could fairly be characterized as tax protester materials for years subsequent” to 1974 were admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) to show intent in failing to file in 1974.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); United States v. Fairchild, 526 F.2d 185, 188-89 (7th Cir.1975) (In trial for selling and passing counterfeit notes, evidence that after the crime charged but before trial defendant had shown witness a large …
discussed Cited "see" C.W. Blalock, Jr. v. United States (2×)
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 838 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); United States v. Levya, 513 F.2d 774, 778 (5th Cir.1975); see also Steinert v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, 543 F.2d 69, 70-71 (9th Cir.1976); cf. Green v. United States, 356 U.S. 165, 187 , 78 S.Ct. 632, 645 , 2 L.Ed.2d 672 (1958) It should be noted that the phrases, "in its presence or so near thereto," as used in section 401(1), see supra note 3, and "actual presence," as used in Fed.R.Crim.P. 42(a), are not synonymous.
cited Cited "see" Richard E. Milhem, Sr. v. United States
7th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 836 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981). 3 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Glenn Harrod Upton
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Farber, 630 F.2d 569, 571-72 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. William Jobe Whaley, Johnny Brown Whaley and Thad Lee Whaley
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Nathaniel Ladson and Eunice Mae Oliver
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Marshall v. Casey
W. Va. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 594 F.2d 86 (5th Cir.1979), reversed on other grounds, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981), discussing, in footnote 18, ex parte requests in district court by the federal government for modification or revocation of bail to prevent the accused from "jumping bail" — "So long as the suspect is granted a hearing immediately after being brought into custody, this procedure satisfies due process requirements.” 594 F.2d at 97, n. 18 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Verkuylen (2×)
Wis. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F2d 830, 847 (5th Cir. 1980), cert denied, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kornblau
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 848 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harold Dean Butts (2×)
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 841 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Anthony Beck
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), 2 cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Joe Willie Parker
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Owens
W.D. Okla. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 , which held that where law enforcement officials have acted without authority or mistakenly, yet in the reasonable good faith belief that such action was proper, the exclusionary rule shall not apply.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Charles George Sorrells, Glen Ray Bartley
11th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Sheppard (2×)
Mass. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 , 841 & n.4a (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (alternative holding), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981) (recognizing that reasonable good faith exception must be grounded on an objective reasonableness).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael O. Farber
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Farber, 630 F.2d 569 , 571 n.2 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Settle (2×)
N.H. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 840-47 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981) (Gee and Vance, JJ.).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Murray
cma · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Theodore Downing
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 , 840-41 & n.4 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 . 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mario De Leon-Reyna (2×)
5th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 840 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc) (holding that the good faith exception applied when a narcotics agent reasonably believed that he had authority to arrest the defendant for violating a court order which required her to remain in Ohio), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981) 12 The State court did not evaluate the reasonableness of the officers' belief, and, therefore, the case was remanded "for consideration of that question." See Illinois v. Rodriguez, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2793, 2801 , 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) 13 To …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Chareou Caprice Condelee (2×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Sanders, 631 F.2d 1309 , 1321 n. 6 (8th Cir.1980) (McMillian, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981) (the expectation of privacy in a purse does not prevent seizures to avoid destruction of evidence while a warrant is prepared).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jon Thomas Cummins
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
The same exigent circumstances exist, and no warrant could have been obtained before the discovery. 30 United States v. Hare, 589 F.2d 1291, 1294 (6th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Sanders, 631 F.2d 1309, 1314 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 (1981); cf. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 471 (1971) (the inadvertency requirement is not met when law enforcement officials "know in advance they will find "the evidence in plain view and intend to seize [it]" (emphasis added)). 31 When Agent Sheren entered the Woodalls' property, he had reason to believe that the defendant h…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Willie C. Cotton, Jr.
10th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hightower v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 841 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den., 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 , Note 4a (the officers’ good faith belief must be based on articulable premises sufficient to cause a reasonable, and reasonably trained, officer to believe he was acting lawfully; the officer’s unawareness of constitutional requirements would not suffice).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Sanders, 631 F.2d 1309 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); State v. Pepe, 176 Conn. 75 , 405 A.2d 51 (1978); Commonwealth v. Millard, 273 Pa.Super.Ct. 523, 417 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jarvis v. Commissioner (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Farber , 630 F.2d 569 (8th Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 449 U.S. 1127 ↩ (1981) . 13.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Charles E. Rice
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Farber, 630 F.2d 569, 571-72 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
United States
No. 80-5586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1981.
449 U.S. 1127
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.