green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“king v. king”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Gerald Eugene Stano v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
(2×)
But see Buford v. State, 403 So.2d 943, 953 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1039 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The State of Texas v. Allan Construction Company, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
king v. king
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Surgical Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. And Johnson & Johnson Hospital Services, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 917 (2d Cir.1981) (“The district court is not obliged to charge every contention made by the parties at trial, as long as the charge itself, taken as a whole, is fundamentally fair.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Federal Election Commission v. Larry R. Williams
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154 (10th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); see also In re United Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Adelman v. Lupo
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F. 2d 910, 915 (2d Cir.1981) (holding that the trial court did not err in excluding a report of the Urban Mass Transit Administration because “the report would have been presented to the jury in ‘an aura of special reliability and trustworthiness’ which would not have been commensurate with its actual reliability.”) (quoting United States v. Fosher, 590 F.2d 381, 383 (1st Cir.1979)), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sirmans v. Amoco Production Co.
See King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154 (10th Cir.1981)(stating that "[a] denial of an accusation of wrongdoing does not constitute fraudulent concealment"), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 (1982); Funnell v. Jones, 737 P.2d 105, 107 (Okla.1985)(explaining that one relying on fraudulent concealment to toll the statute of limitations must show that he did not know facts constituting a cause of action), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 853 (1987). 10 Therefore, for substantially the same reasons contained in its order dated June 9, 1994, the judgment of the United States Distric…
discussed
Cited "see"
60 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1336, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,464, 35 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 551 Bennie Figures, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Board of Public Utilities of the City of Kansas City, Kansas, the City of Kansas City, Kansas, C.R. Singleton, Jim Widener Clarence Degraeve and Joseph Dick, and Tom Lynch and Clifford Nesselrode, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc. 662 F.2d 910, 914-15 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982). 24 Figures' second issue concerns the trial court's exclusion of anecdotal evidence of discrimination.
cited
Cited "see"
Figures v. Board of Public Utilities
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc. 662 F.2d 910, 914-15 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corporation
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 919 (2d Cir.1981) (where contract required test of small sample before design deemed to conform to contract and before seller was allowed to deliver bulk of goods, receipt of sample did not constitute tender of delivery), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carbontek Trading Co., Ltd. And Kermit A. Rosenberg v. Phibro Energy, Inc.
See City of New York v. Pullman Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 917 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982) (although an injured buyer is under a duty to mitigate damages, the burden is on the breaching seller to show that its alternative option “was a viable means of reducing damages”); Larsen v. A.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moll v. US Life Title Ins. Co. of New York
See King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154-56 (10 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); cf. Davis v. Bryan, 810 F.2d 42 (2d Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Hardin v. City Title & Escrow Company
See King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154-56 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colorado Ex Rel. Woodard v. Western Paving Construction Co.
See King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982) (Involving cause of action for alleged violations of Sherman Act); Berkson v. Del Monte Corp., 743 F.2d 53, 55 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1765 , 84 L.Ed.2d 527 (1985) (Sherman Act); In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 600 F.2d 1148, 1169 (5th Cir.1979) (Sherman Act); Charlotte Telecasters, Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp., 546 F.2d 570, 574 (4th Cir.1976) (Sherman Act); Dayco Corp v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber C…
cited
Cited "see"
Lilley v. Dow Chemical Co.
See City of New York v. Pullman, 662 F.2d 910 , 915 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
See City of New York v. Pullman, 662 F.2d 910 , 915 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara Stissi, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald Stissi, Deceased v. Interstate and Ocean Transport Co. Of Philadelphia, in the Matter of the Complaint of Interstate Towing Co., as Owner of the Tug Delaware, Interstate Marine Transport Co., as Owner of the Barge Interstate 36, and Interstate and Ocean Transport Co., as Bareboat Charterer of the Barge Interstate 36, and the Tug Delaware, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. Judith Lax, as Administratrix of the Estate of Ruth Calabro, Deceased v. Interstate Towing Co., as Owner of the Tug Delaware, Interstate Marine Transport Co., as Owner of the Barge Interstate 36, and Sonat Marine, Inc., Formerly Known as Interstate and Ocean Transport Co., as Bareboat Charterer of the Barge Interstate 36, and Tug Delaware, Sonat Marine, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Thomas J. Furey, Cross-Appellant v. Interstate Towing Co., as Owner of the Tug Delaware, Interstate Marine Transport Co., as Owner of the Barge Interstate 36, and Sonat Marine, Inc., Formerly Known as Interstate and Ocean Transport Co., as Bareboat Charterer of the Barge Interstate 36, and Tug Delaware, Sonat Marine, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 914-15 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637 F.2d 87, 94 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stissi v. Interstate & Ocean Transport Co.
See City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 914-15 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637 F.2d 87, 94 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lfc Lessors, Inc. v. Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corp.
See City of New York v. Pullman Inc., 477 F.Supp. 438, 442 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 662 F.2d 910 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Rockwell International Corp. v. City of New York, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982). 1 Whatever the correct meaning of the phrase, it is clear that both Pacific Sewer and LFC have misperceived the effect of forum selection clauses in general. [S]uch a provision does not oust the jurisdiction of the courts; in effect it merely constitutes a stipulation in which the parties join in asking the court to give effect to their agreement by declining…
cited
Cited "see"
Trotter v. State
See Buford v. State, 403 So.2d 943 (Fla.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1039 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lore v. City of Syracuse
See, e.g., New York v. Pullman Inc., 662 F.2d 910 , 917 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982). a.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
See also United States v. Butler, 980 F.2d 619, 621-22 (10th Cir.1992) (upholding police officer's warrantless entry into an arrestees’s trailer to retrieve shoes because of presence of broken glass, "several hundred beer cans,” and auto parts strewn on ground, and departing from Circuit's more general rule prohibiting warrantless entry into a private dwelling "solely upon the desire of law enforcement officers to complete [an] arrestee’s wardrobe” in United States v. Anthon, 648 F.2d 669 (10th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1039 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berenda v. Langford
See, e.g., King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1155-56 (10th Cir.1981) (holding that knowledge that competitor was raising and lowering prices did not constitute knowledge of price-fixing conspiracy), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gantz v. Colonial Central Savings Bank, F.S.B. (In Re Gantz)
General Industries, 79 B.R. at 131 (citing In re Ristich, 57 B.R. 568, 577 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1986)); see also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 550 (5th Cir.) (Clark, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1981); Bundles, 856 F.2d at 822 n. 12; In re Alsop, 14 B.R. 982, 987-88 (Bankr.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Five Smiths, Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n
Compare King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1150-54 (10th Cir.1981) (various anticompetitive practices, including an exchange of market and price information, when combined with an agreement to lower and then raise prices to force discounter out of business, demonstrated the existence of a per se illegal price-fixing conspiracy), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982), with United States v. Citizens & Southern Nat’l Bank, 422 U.S. at 113 , 95 S.Ct. at 2115 ("the dissemination of price information is not itself a per se violation of the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rural Telephone Service Co. v. Feist Publications, Inc.
Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 451 U.S. 557, 566 , 101 S.Ct. 1923, 1929 , 68 L.Ed.2d 442 (1981) (“The vagaries of the marketplace usually deny us sure knowledge of what plaintiffs situation would have been in the absence of defendant’s antitrust violation.”); Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine, 395 U.S. 100, 123 , 89 S.Ct. 1562, 1576 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969) (“damages issue in [cases where plaintiff was partially or totally excluded from a market] are rarely susceptible of the kind of concrete, detailed proof of injury which is available in other contexts”); see also King & King En…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gentile v. County of Suffolk
See also City of New York v. Pullman Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 915 (2d Cir.1981) (government reports have “ ‘aura of special reliability’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeder v. Kermit Johnson, Alphagraphics, Inc.
See Harold Friedman, Inc. v. Thorofare Markets, 587 F.2d 127 , 138 n. 41 (3rd Cir.1978) (when the plaintiff attained knowledge of the violation is irrelevant; “in the absence of fraudulent concealment by the defendants ... the statute is not tolled by plaintiff’s failure to discover the existence of the cause of action.”); see also King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1150-51 (10th Cir.1981) (similar rule stated), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Colorado v. Western Paving Construction Co.
See, e.g., King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); Charlotte Telecasters, Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp., 546 F.2d 570, 574 (4th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colorado ex rel. Colorado Attorney General v. Western Paving Construction Co.
See, e.g., King & King Enters. v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); Charlotte Telecasters, Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp., 546 F.2d 570, 574 (4th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bundles v. Baker (In Re Bundles)
See also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank and Trust, 647 F.2d 547 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982) (approving Durrett’s adoption of a 70% standard for determining reasonable equivalency); In re Richardson, 23 B.R. 434 (D.Utah 1982) (reserving a ruling on whether a transfer for 21% of the equity is for reasonably equivalent value); In re Perdido Bay Country Club Estates, Inc., 23 B.R. 36 (S.D.Fla.1982) (accepting Durrett's holding that a transfer for 57.7% of the fair market value was not for a “fair equivalent”); In re Coleman, 21 B.R. 832 (S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
See, e.g., City of New York v. Pullman, Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 915 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy International Airport on June 24, 1975, 635 F.2d 67, 73 (2d Cir.1980); Marx & Co., Inc. v. Diners’ Club, Inc., 550 F.2d 505, 511-12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Winshall Settlor's Trust, Julie Winshall, Trustee, Debtor-Appellant
In Durrett v. Washington National Insurance Co., 621 F.2d 201 (5th Cir.1980), on which the Trust relies, the court held that a foreclosure sale was a “transfer of an interest of the debtor” for purposes of § 548; and that a sale of property for 57.7% of its fair market value was not “fair equivalence” as a matter of law. 621 F.2d at 203-04 ; see also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1981); In re Richardson, 23 B.R. 434, 444-48 (Bankr.Utah 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willis v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. (In Re Willis)
See also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); Note, Nonjudicial Foreclosure Under Deed of Trust May Be A Fraudulent Transfer of Bankrupt’s Property, 47 Mo.L.Rev. 345 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.
Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 451 U.S. 557, 566 , 101 S.Ct. 1923, 1929 , 68 L.Ed.2d 442 (1981) (“The vagaries of the marketplace usually deny us sure knowledge of what plaintiff’s situation would have been in the absence of defendant’s antitrust violation.”); Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine, 395 U.S. 100, 123 , 89 S.Ct. 1562, 1576 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969) (“damages issue in [cases where plaintiff was partially or totally excluded from a market] are rarely susceptible of the kind of concrete, detailed proof of injury which is available in other contexts”); see also King & King…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation v. Aspen Skiing Company
Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 451 U.S. 557, 566 , 101 S.Ct. 1923, 1929 , 68 L.Ed.2d 442 (1981) ("The vagaries of the marketplace usually deny us sure knowledge of what plaintiff's situation would have been in the absence of defendant's antitrust violation."); Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine, 395 U.S. 100, 123 , 89 S.Ct. 1562, 1576 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969) ("damages issue in [cases where plaintiff was partially or totally excluded from a market] are rarely susceptible of the kind of concrete, detailed proof of injury which is available in other contexts"); see also King & King Enterprises…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strauser v. Veterans Administration (In Re Strauser)
See also, Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1981) {Durrett holding that a nonjudicial foreclosure sale was a transfer within the purview of § 67(d) of the Bankruptcy Act followed).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John J. Torniero
See, e.g., City of New York v. Pullman Inc., 662 F.2d 910, 919-20 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William v. Travelers Insurance Co. (In re William)
In Re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197, 1199-1202 (9th Cir.1984); see also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank and Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549-50 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William v. Travelers Insurance Co. (In Re William)
In Re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197, 1199-1202 (9th Cir.1984); see also Abramson v. Lakewood Bank and Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549-50 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The American Bearing Company, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc. And Litton Industrial Products, Inc. Appeal of American Bearing Company
See, e.g., City of New York v. Pullman, 662 F.2d 910 , 915 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982) (evidence that has special aura of infallibility properly excluded under Rule 403); Marx & Co. v. Diner's Club, Inc., 550 F.2d 505 , 511 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977) (expert’s dogmatic conclusion, though relevant, excludable under Rule 403).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ozzie Lee Avery, Jr.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. at 478 , 86 S.Ct. at 1629 ; see also United States v. Anthon, 648 F.2d 669, 673-74 (10th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1039 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 (1982); United States v. Foskey, 636 F.2d 517, 521-22 (D.C.Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clulow v. State Of Oklahoma
See, e.g., King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154-56 (10th Cir.1981) (antitrust), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 ; Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 691-94 (10th Cir.1981) (securities fraud), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clulow v. Oklahoma
See, e.g., King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co., 657 F.2d 1147, 1154-56 (10th Cir.1981) (antitrust), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1164 , 102 S.Ct. 1038 , 71 L.Ed.2d 320 ; Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 691-94 (10th Cir.1981) (securities fraud), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lakewood Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Abramson, Trustee
v.
Abramson, Trustee
No. 81-903.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
454 U.S. 1164
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motions of American Land Title Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Federal Land Bank of Texas et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.