green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V Montmartre
But cf. Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 184 , 1982 A.M.C. 2752, 2767 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 , 1982.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corporation
See Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that we engage in a more careful scrutiny of factual findings not prepared by the district court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp.
See Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that we engage in a more careful scrutiny of factual findings not prepared by the district court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
David Nicol v. Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels, Inc., in Personam
See generally Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173 (5th *297 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
David Yashon, M.D. v. Ian W. Gregory, M.D.
See Purex Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Otero v. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51, 628 F.2d 1271 (10th Cir.1980); Blizard v. Frechette, 601 F.2d 1217 (1st Cir.1979); Hennessy v. Schmidt, 583 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLINICAL LEASING SERVICE, INC., ET AL
See Baker v. Raymond Int'l, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 180 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that it is reversible error for a district court to fail to "present adequately and in context the factors that might warrant the imposition of [alter ego] liability"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S. Ct. 2256 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law."), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley Ex Rel. Michigan Natural Resources Commission v. Arco Industries Corp.
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joslyn Corporation v. TL James & Co., Inc.
See also, Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) (“[t]he principle of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); and Krivo Industrial Supply Company v. National Distillers and Chemical Corp., 483 F.2d 1098, 1102 (5th Cir.1973) (“the corporate form ... is not lightly disregarded since limited liability is one of the principal purposes for which the law has created the corporation.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gulf Oil Corp.
v.
Petrol Stops Northwest
v.
Petrol Stops Northwest
No. 81-1479.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.