green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Gibbs, Stephen A/K/A \Jake
(2×)
But see United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374, 1377-79 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982) (adopting Fifth Circuit precedent of "substantial independent evidence" test); United States v. Slade, 627 F.2d 293, 307 (D.C.Cir.1980) (same test); United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (same test), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979) 12 In Trotter, this court refused to accept the Government's suggestion that a less rigorous standard requiring only "prima facie proof" was appropriate in light of United St…
cited
Cited "see"
Beckwith v. Anderson
See United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerardo Antonio Gomez, A/K/A Jerry Gomez, United States of America v. Mickey Crocker, United States of America v. Kelly Lynn Hanlon, A/K/A Leslie Ann Warren
See United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 & n. 7 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1). 13 We hold that the court did not commit reversible error in admitting Bradshaw's out-of-court declarations without making additional findings on the record, at the close of the testimony, based on a "preponderance of the evidence" standard. 2. 14 Sufficiency of the evidence regarding Gomez' connection to 15 the conspiracy 16 Gomez also argues that the Government did not present sufficient independent evidence to connect him to th…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gomez
See United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 & n. 7 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
See United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 585 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Allen, 554 F.2d at 410 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. Frye
See, e.g., United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Miller, 20 F.3d 926 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 226 , 130 L.Ed.2d 152 (1994); Howell; Moran. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spence v. State
See also U.S. v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 582 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982) (Held, delay against defendant was only partly for investigative reasons; therefore, second prong of the claim, prejudice to defendant, was required to be proven.) It was error for the trial judge in this cause not to have considered the testimony which was elicited at the remand hearing, and it was also error for the trial judge not to have allowed full discovery of all non-privileged material both at the initial hearing and on remand.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. Huttinger
(2×)
McCormack, Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations 4-46--4-47 (Knowles Law Book Publishing, Inc. 1989) 85 Id. at 4-47, citing, United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 121 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983) ("The prohibition against schemes or artifices to defraud is properly interpreted to be independent of the clause 'for obtaining money or property.' ") (Citations omitted); see also United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 585 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); McLendon v. Continental Group, I…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Allen Standridge
See, e.g., United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Howard v. United *1037 States, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant
Id. at 1119 (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 581 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Hendricks, 661 F.2d 38, 40 (5th Cir.1980); cf. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101, 116 (1972). 19 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Lee Burke
See also United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 , 1381 n. 9 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Frankel
See also United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 585 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Bruce, 488 F.2d 1224, 1229 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825 , 95 S.Ct. 41 , 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); Silverman v. United States, 213 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir.1954); Fournier v. United States, 58 F.2d 3, 5 (7th Cir.1932).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul W. Granville
See, e.g., United States v. Humphrey, 670 F.2d 153, 155 (11th Cir.) (entrapment), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hubert Jerome Yonn, Gary Carl Weeks, Hugo Sanes-Saavedra
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374, 1379 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 , 102 S.Ct. 2305 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Celifie
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6607.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1982.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.