green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blum v. Lanier
(2×)
Although no statute or ordinance prescribes the proposition’s form in this instance, Blum argues that the City’s choice of language is nonetheless limited by the common law, which requires that the proposition identify the measure “with such definiteness and certainty that the voters are not misled.” Reynolds Land & Cattle Co. v. McCabe, 72 Tex. 57 , 12 S.W. 165, 165-66 (1888); see also Bischoff v. City of Austin, 656 S.W.2d 209, 212 (Tex.App.—Austin 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied 466 U.S. 919 , 104 S.Ct. 1699 , 80 L.Ed.2d 172 (1984)(same); Wright v. Board of Trustees of Tatu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Bryan
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. A-791.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1984.
Application, Brennan, Grant.
Published
Application for emergency relief, with respect to the order of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, dated this day, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant the application.