green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Northeast Utilities Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Northeast Utilities Service Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Towns of Concord, Norwood and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Maine Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Canal Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the American Paper Institute, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984). 18 Duke's primary argument is that the formula rate schedules contained in the interconnection agreements implicitly permit the recovery of Account 407 charges.
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Kansas Cities v. FERC, 723 F.2d 82, 87 (D.C.Cir.1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Horn & Hardart Company v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984). 31 Because the majority reaches the opposite result, I respectfully dissent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Appalachian Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 529 F.2d 342, 348 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.
See Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Appalachian Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 529 F.2d 342, 348 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. DeFiore, 720 F.2d 757, 761-62 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boston Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Memphis Light, 358 U.S. at 112 , 79 S.Ct. 194 ; see also Papago Tribal Utility Auth. v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Kansas Cities v. FERC, 723 F.2d 82, 87 (D.C.Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carey Canada, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Company the Celotex Corporation v. Columbia Casualty Company
Co., 757 F.2d 1172, 1174-75 (11th Cir.1985); Fabrica Italiana Lavorazione Materie Organiche, S.A.S. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 684 F.2d 776, 780 (11th Cir.1982); see also Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC, 723 F.2d 950, 955 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dailey v. Carlin
See also, Carroll v. United States, 721 F.2d 155 (5th Cir.1983) ( Bush precludes Bivens action by former employee seeking re-employment who only had "a measure" of administrative remedies), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1241 , 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Francisco v. Schmidt, 575 F.Supp. 1200 (E.D.Wis.1983) ( Bivens inappropriate in area of federal employment relations); Watson v. HUD, 576 F.Supp. 580 (N.D.Ill.1983) (administrative remedies for probationary employees adequate thereby precluding Bivens action); Kotarski v. Etter, 579 F.Supp. 391 (E.D.N.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Standard Drywall Corp.
See also United States v. DeFiore, 720 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.1983) (distinguishing Henderson in prosecution for wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1982), where state, rather than federal, tax laws were violated, and noting that United States v. Miller rejected Henderson where federal tax laws were violated), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1684 , 80 L.Ed.2d 158 , - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3511 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984). 14 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas D. Gaertner v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Schafer, 726 F.2d 155, 157-58 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct, 3512 , 82 L.Ed.2d 820 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeFiore
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-1577.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1984.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.