green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
(2×)
See Tichnell v. State, 297 Md. 432, 440 , 468 A.2d 1, 5 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 993 , 104 S.Ct. 2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 846 , reh'g denied, 467 U.S. 1268 , 104 S.Ct. 3564 , 82 L.Ed.2d 865 (1984); Jones v. State, 288 Md. 618, 625 , 420 A.2d 1241, 1244 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1115 , 101 S.Ct. 928 , 66 L.Ed.2d 845 (1981); Sweetwine v. State, 288 Md. 199, 204 , 421 A.2d 60, 63 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 579 , 66 L.Ed.2d 477 (1980), habeas corpus, Sweetwine v. Maryland, 769 F.2d 991 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 1209 , 89 L.Ed.2d 322 (1986); Parks v.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton H. Halperin v. Henry A. Kissinger
We have acknowledged in the past that “the law of the case ‘is not an inexorable command that rigidly binds a court to its former decisions but rather is an expression of good sense and wise judicial practice.’ ” Melong v. Micronesian Claims Commission, 643 F.2d 10,17 (D.C.Cir.1980) (quoting Carpa v. Ward Foods, Inc., 567 F.2d 1316,1320 (5th Cir.1978)); see Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475 , 481 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“Application of the doctrine is in any event discretionary____”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1200 , 104 S.Ct. 3563 , 82 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wooten-Bey v. State
See also Tichnell v. State, 297 Md. 432 , 468 A.2d 1 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 993 , 104 S.Ct. 2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 846 reh’g denied, 467 U.S. 1268 , 104 S.Ct. 3564 , 82 L.Ed.2d 865 (1984).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Boston, 718 F.2d 1511, 1515 (10th Cir.1983), cert. den. 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 , rehearing den. 467 U.S. 1268 , 104 S.Ct. 3563 , 82 L.Ed.2d 864 [in indictment for violation of the Hobbs Act, in which interference with commerce is an essential element, it is not necessary for the indictment to allege the exact nature of the interference with commerce].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Novel
v.
Louisiana Exposition City of Perryton, Texas v. Jacks et ux. Safir v. Dole, Secretary of Transportation Boston v. United States Williams v. Illinois Porter v. McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections Moss v. United States Mileski v. Maryland Tichnell v. Maryland and Calhoun v. Maryland Henry v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Foster v. Strickland, Warden Venkatesan v. International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Local Union 545-D
v.
Louisiana Exposition City of Perryton, Texas v. Jacks et ux. Safir v. Dole, Secretary of Transportation Boston v. United States Williams v. Illinois Porter v. McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections Moss v. United States Mileski v. Maryland Tichnell v. Maryland and Calhoun v. Maryland Henry v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Foster v. Strickland, Warden Venkatesan v. International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Local Union 545-D
No. 83-1547; No. 83-1574; No. 83-1627; No. 83-1701; No. 83-5785; No. 83-5808; No. 83-5855; No. 83-6249; No. 83-6346; No. 83-6430; No. 83-6583; No. 83-6604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1984.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar