green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gomez
See United States v. Cassity, 720 F.2d 451, 457 (6th Cir.1983) (holding that defendant had standing to challenge search of container stored in his home that he did not own or know the contents of), vacated on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 3581 , 82 L.Ed.2d 879 (1984); United States v. Issacs, 708 F.2d 1365, 1367-69 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that defendant had legitimate expectation of privacy in contents of locked safe stored in his apartment but owned by third party who had the key); United States v. Perez, 700 F.2d 1232, 1236 (8th Cir.1983) (holding that defendant could challenge se…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth King
(2×)
See United States v. Cassity, 720 F.2d 451, 456 (6th Cir. 1983), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1212 (1984), rev'd on other grounds, 604 F. Supp. 1566 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Biaggi
See United States v. Cross, 708 F.2d 631, 634 (11th Cir.1983), vacated on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 3580 , 82 L.Ed.2d 879 (1984); United States v. Holman, 680 F.2d 1340, 1355-56 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Perez-Hernandez, 672 F.2d 1380, 1386 (11th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raleigh Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
See Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532, 1556 (11th Cir.1983), vacated and remanded, 468 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 874 adhered to on remand, 739 F.2d 531 (1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 3580 , 82 L.Ed.2d 879 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See also United States v. Cassity, 720 F.2d 451, 454-457 (6th Cir.1983), vacated in part, United States v. Cassity, 468 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 3581 , 82 L.Ed.2d 879 (1984) (discussing Knotts as relying on the automobile exception and the open fields doctrine to reason that the hidden beeper in that case revealed nothing more to the police that what they constitutionally could have obtained through permissible visual surveillance.) Relying upon the Knotts , a number of federal courts have held that the Government is not required to obtain a court order or a search warrant to install a hidden tra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braun v. Powell
In Waller the Supreme Court noted this consistent view of the lower federal courts: See, e.g., Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532, 1542 (11th Cir.1983) (citing cases), cert. pending, Nos. 83-817, 83-995[ 468 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984), 468 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 3580 , 82 L.Ed.2d 879 (1984)].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douglas
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
No. 83-995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 5, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Waller v. Georgia, 467 U. S. 39 (1984).