green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…unique circumstances do not excuse untimeliness when they are unrelated to counsel's failure to file the appeal
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…we have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry of judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal "within the prescribed time.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…we have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry of judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal within the prescribed time
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jimmy Lancaster v. Dwight Presley
(2×)
we have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry of judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal "within the prescribed time.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lancaster v. Presley
(2×)
we have consistently held that the simple failure of the clerk to mail notice of the entry of judgment, without more, does not permit relief to a party who has failed to appeal within the prescribed time
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zapata Gulf Marine Corp. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority
(2×)
unique circumstances do not excuse untimeliness when they are unrelated to counsel's failure to file the appeal
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Orshan v. Macchiarola
rule 77(d) evinces a decision by the advisory committee and by the supreme court, in adopting the committee's recommendation, to choose a simple inexorable mandate over a flexible rule.
examined
Cited "see"
William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley, Roger Collins v. George C. Welborn
(4×)
See Walker v. Lockhart, 726 F.2d 1238, 1259 (8th Cir.1984) (en banc) (Bright, J., dissenting), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222 , 105 S.Ct. 17 , 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984), and cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Wood F. Jones and Mary Jones, Debtors. Wood F. Jones and Mary Jones v. W.J. Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Wilson v. Atwood Group, 725 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222 , 105 S.Ct. 17 , 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
(2×)
See F. Wilson v. Atwood *612 Group, [ 725 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. en banc), cert. dismissed, [— U.S. —] 105 S.Ct. 17 [ 82 L.Ed.2d 912 ] (1984)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Crash At Dallas/Fort Worth Airport On August 2, 1985.
(2×)
See, e.g., Wilson v. Atwood Group, 725 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222 , 105 S.Ct. 17 , 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984) (dismissing appeal after district court granted 60(b) motion). 9 By the Rule 60(b) motion Delta attacked the July 8 order but the sole purpose was to extend the time for appeal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Wilson v. Atwood Group, 725 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1222 , 105 S.Ct. 17 , 82 L.Ed.2d 912 (1984) (dismissing appeal after district court granted 60(b) motion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Lockhart, Superintendent, Arkansas Department of Corrections
v.
Lockhart, Superintendent, Arkansas Department of Corrections
No. 83-1835.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 31, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.