green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“he inoculation is not the cause of every event that occurs within the ten-day period . . . . without more, this proximate temporal relationship will not support a finding of causation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dixon v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
he inoculation is not the cause of every event that occurs within the ten-day period . . . . without more, this proximate temporal relationship will not support a finding of causation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aea v. United States
See Strother v. Secretary of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 21 Cl.Ct. 365, 370 (1990) (citing Hasler v. United States, 718 F.2d 202, 205-06 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sederquist v. Court
See Redding Ford v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 , 498 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984); see also Berry v. McLemore, 795 F.2d 452, 455-56 (5th Cir.1986) (ancillary jurisdiction did not extend to subsequent garnishment proceeding brought to collect judgment entered in federal court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sederquist v. Court
See Redding Ford v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 , 498 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984); see also Berry v. McLemore, 795 F.2d 452, 455-56 (5th Cir.1986) (ancillary jurisdiction did not extend to subsequent garnishment proceeding brought to collect judgment entered in federal court). 23 The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 24 AFFIRMED. 1 City of Klawock v. Gustafson, 585 F.2d 428 (9th Cir.1979), is not to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia Benedict and Leonard Benedict v. United States
(2×)
See Hosler v. United States, 718 F.2d 202 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Casiano Figueroa
Accord United States v. Ayres, 725 F.2d 806, 809 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pro Sales, Inc. v. Texaco, U.S.A., a Division of Texaco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Redding Ford v. California State Board of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496, 497 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,622 Sherri Bogorad v. Eli Lilly & Company
See Moning v. Alfono, 400 Mich. 425 , 254 N.W.2d 759 (1977). 29 The defendant also relies upon Hasler v. United States, 517 F.Supp. 1262 (E.D.Mich.1981), rev'd on other grounds, 718 F.2d 202 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) and Keil v. Eli Lilly & Company, 88 F.R.D. 296 (E.D.Mich.1980) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gamache v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
See e.g., Hasler v. United States, 718 F.2d 202, 205 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984) (to show that a vaccine was the cause in fact of an injury, a party must show that the injury was the natural and probable result of the vaccine).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shepard v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
See, e.g., Strother v. Secretary of HHS, 21 Cl.Ct. 365, 370 (1990), citing Hasler v. United States, 718 F.2d 202 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 [ 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 ] (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Enriqueta Cirila Trinidad De Jongh
See, e.g., United States v. Ayres, 725 F.2d 806, 812 (1st Cir.) (no mistrial necessary following inadvertent breach of actual sequestration order), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984); see also United States v. Kindle, 925 F.2d 272, 276 (8th Cir.1991) (mistrial not required when appellant suffered no prejudice from challenged contacts between sequestered witnesses and federal agents); United States v. Arruda, 715 F.2d 671, 684 (1st Cir.1983) (where sequestration order breached, district court had discretion to allow the witness’ testimony to stand and to refuse a…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Meadows v. Dominican Republic
See, e.g., Redding Ford v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 , 497 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles v. Dominican Republic
See, e.g., Redding Ford v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 722 F.2d 496 , 497 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 84 , 83 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hasler
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-1537.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.