green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric J. Moore Craig C. Robinson Ray L. Williams Keith L. Cooks Lashonda R. Robinson Sherice Y. Thompson
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 726 F.2d 852, 859 (1st Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 841 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984) (stating in a wiretap case that “absence of a compelling signature on a critical document can be remedied by proof of actual authority”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ariel Santiago v. United States
See United States v. Harris, 727 F.2d 401, 406-07 (5th Cir.) (claim made on direct appeal that stand committed fine violates equal protection premature in view of administrative remedies), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 840 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984); United States v. Mack, 655 F.2d 843, 846-47 (8th Cir.1981) (same, in context of § 2255 petition).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Henderson v. Thieret
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 841 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Mucker v. Mizell
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 841 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Elmer Cartee and Patrick Russell v. Crispus Nix, Warden, and Neil Hartigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439, 1442 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 841 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Broesch v. Gagnon
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439 , 1443 n. 5 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack Riner v. Norman G. Owens, Superintendent, Indiana State Reformatory, Respondent
(2×)
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439, 1441 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984) (since Indiana Supreme Court treats issues not raised on direct appeal as waived for purposes of Indiana post-conviction remedy, a petitioner need not raise those issues in a post-conviction petition or on an appeal from the denial of a post-conviction petition in order to exhaust his state remedies). .
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Zellers v. Jack Duckworth, Warden, Indiana State Prison
(2×)
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439 (7th Cir.) (applying Wainwright standard to failure to raise issue in post-conviction proceeding), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Leo Keys v. Jack Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
See Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439, 1441 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mancil Wallace v. Jack Duckworth and Indiana Attorney General
See, e.g., Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439, 1441-42 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984); Zellers v. Duckworth, 763 F.2d 250, 252-53 (7th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bacon
v.
DeRobertis, Warden
v.
DeRobertis, Warden
No. 83-6765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.