Bennett v. City of Slidell, 469 U.S. 913 (1984). · Go Syfert
Bennett v. City of Slidell, 469 U.S. 913 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“In order to justify forced entry without an announcement of authority and refusal of admittance, there must be some evidence to support the suspicion that contraband will be destroyed.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • Youtz v. State, 494 So. 2d 189 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986).published
    “In order to justify forced entry without an announcement of authority and refusal of admittance, there must be some evidence to support the suspicion that contraband will be destroyed.”
  • United States v. Lashawn Lowell Banks, 282 F.3d 699 (9th Cir. 2002).published
    “In order to justify forced entry without an announcement of authority and refusal of admittance, there must be some evidence to support the suspicion that contraband will be destroyed.”
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bennett
v.
City of Slidell
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1984.
Published opinion
469 U.S. 913
1984 U.S. LEXIS 3981

Motion of petitioner to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certio-rari with an appendix that does not comply with the Rules of this Court denied.