green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Washington Water Power Company, United States of America v. Jeremiah P. Buckley, United States of America v. Ellsworth B. Sargent
United States v. Baker, 494 F.2d 1262, 1265 (6th Cir.1974); but see United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 361 (2d Cir.) (government need not show that defendant knew proceedings were federal, but only that they were judicial), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland
Accord, United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Pollina v. United States, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 (1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) (even though warrant issued for electronic surveillance did not include a specific crime as a possible violation, authorization could be inferred when judge authorizing extension of tap was made aware of material facts constituting or clearly relating to other offenses in application for extension); United States v. Gerena, 653 F.Supp. 974, 977-79 (D.Conn. 1987)…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giovanelli
See United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 (1986) (“authorization under 18 U.S.C. § 2517 (5) may be inferred when a judicial officer grants a continuation of the surveillance, even though the offense was not listed in the original order, so long as he was made aware of ‘material facts constituting or clearly relating to [the] other offenses' in the application for the continuance.” (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wright
See, e.g., United States v. Maxwell, 25 F.3d 1389, 1394 (8th Cir.) (“Intervening weekends, holidays, and the unavailability of the issuing judge are satisfactory explanations for slight delays [7 days] in presenting wiretap recordings for sealing.”) (citing in part United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 362-63 (2nd Cir.) (“two-day intervening holiday, unavailability of issuing judge, and need to prepare paperwork provided adequate explanation for five-day delay”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 (1986)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1031 , 115 S.Ct. 610 (1994); …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Heintze
Smith, supra; see also State v. Johnson, 379 N.W.2d 291, 293 (N.D.) [failure to define “object” did not constitute obvious error], ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 337 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin Davis
United States v. Scaife, 749 F.2d 338, 348 (6th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Ardito, 782 F.2d 358, 360-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 338 cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 , 106 S.Ct. 2281 , 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) (finding no scienter requirement that defendants know they were obstructing a federal proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Haverluk
(2×)
State v. Kraft, supra; State v. Janda, 397 N.W.2d 59, 70 (N.D.1986); Explanatory Note to Rule 52, N.D.R.Crim.P.; see also State v. Johnson, 379 N.W.2d 291, 293 (N.D.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 337 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thiel
See also State v. Johnson, 379 N.W.2d 291, 293 (N.D.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1792 , 90 L.Ed.2d 337 (1986) [distinguishing cases of constitutional error from error found to be "not of constitutional magnitude.”] The error in this case is not of constitutional dimension.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karapinka
v.
Union Carbide Corp.
v.
Union Carbide Corp.
No. 85-1595.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 1986.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.