green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Kjnowledge and deliberate avoidance of knowledge are the same thing.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"[K]nowledge and deliberate avoidance of knowledge are the same thing."
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. William E. Miller, William L. Phillips, and Sherry J. Mitchell
(2×)
kjnowledge and deliberate avoidance of knowledge are the same thing.
cited
Cited "see"
Nolte v. Gibbs International, Inc.
See United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory L. Myers
(2×)
See United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 193 (7th Cir.) (“The sixth amendment does not come into play until after the suspect becomes ‘accused.’ There is therefore no right to counsel before the grand jury-”) (internal citation omitted), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986); United States v. Vasquez, 675 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir.1982) (“While the government’s investigation of Vasquez may have commenced when he was called before the grand jury for the first time, the fact that a person is the subject of 'an investigation is not enough to trigger his Sixt…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis G. Antzoulatos
See United *725 States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 189-190 (7th Cir.1986) (collecting cases), certiorari denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 ; cf. United States v. Bader, 956 F.2d 708, 710 (7th Cir.1992) (construing the term knowingly in the Sentencing Guidelines to include more than “should have known” but noting the possibility of conscious avoidance).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 190 (7th Cir.1986) (“a person who has enough knowledge to prompt an investigation and then avoids further knowledge really does ‘know’ all that the law requires”) cer t. denied, McCreary v. United States, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arizona v. Standard Oil Co.
See United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 191 (7th Cir.) (statements admitted under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) may be used to prove conspiracy without any showing that the existence of the conspiracy is corroborated by independent, nonhearsay evidence), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986); see also United States v. Cross, 816 F.2d 297, 302 (7th Cir.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.
See United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 191 (7th Cir.) (statements admitted under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) may be used to prove conspiracy without any showing that the existence of the conspiracy is corroborated by independent, nonhearsay evidence), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986); see also United States v. Cross, 816 F.2d 297, 302 (7th Cir.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry C. Kaufmann
Antzoulatos, 962 F.2d at 724-25 (upheld as applied to 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(B)); see also United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 189-90 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986); United States v. Valencia, 907 F.2d 671, 679 (7th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Breque, 964 F.2d 381, 387-88 (5th Cir.1992), petition for cert, filed (Oct. 26, 1992) (no error in giving deliberate ignorance instruction in relation to § 1956(a)(3)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joyce Williams A/K/A Latonya Williams
See also United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 191-93 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986) (holding that although the district court erred in admitting into evidence a statement of past recollection recorded, the error was harmless).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eduardo De Francisco-Lopez
(2×)
See also United States v. Ramsey, 785 F.2d 184, 189 (7th Cir.) ("An ostrich instruction informs the jury that actual knowledge and deliberate avoidance of knowledge are the same thing."), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 , 106 S.Ct. 2924 , 91 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986). 41 Taken literally, the court's new rule would be at odds with our precedent because some evidence will support both actual knowledge and deliberate ignorance.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Newsome, Warden
v.
Newsome, Warden
No. 85-6814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.