green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
HARRIS v. DRAKE
See id. (discussing the need for a showing of “specific compensable, non-abstract harm” (quoting City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F.2d 1547 (7th Cir.1986), aff’d, 479 U.S. 1048 (1987))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizen Action Fund D/B/A Louisiana Citizen Action v. City of Morgan City
See City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 919 , 93 L.Ed.2d 972 (1987) (affirming Seventh Circuit decision invalidating a city ordinance *216 that limited solicitation to the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). 6 . ' Under the Fourteenth Amendment, this circuit has recognized a substantive due process right and a § 1983 remedy for emotional harms even in the absence of physical injuries.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Witnesses
Accord In re Grand Jury Subpoena (85-W-71-5), 784 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir.), cert. granted, 479 U.S. 811 , 107 S.Ct. 59 , 93 L.Ed.2d 18 (1986), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 918 , 93 L.Ed.2d 865 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. City of Santa Barbara
See Sabelko, 846 F.Supp. at 825, citing City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F.2d 1547 (7th Cir.1986), aff'd without opinion 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 919 , 93 L.Ed.2d 972 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Commissioners of the Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of Delaware
See City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F.2d 1547, 1554 (7th Cir.1986), aff'd, 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 919 , 93 L.Ed.2d 972 , and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. City of Frontenac, 714 F.2d 813, 818 (8th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. COM'RS OF COM'N ON ADULT ENT. EST.
See City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F.2d 1547, 1554 (7th Cir.1986), aff'd, 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 919 , 93 L.Ed.2d 972 , and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. City of Frontenac, 714 F.2d 813, 818 (8th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Braswell v. United States
(2×)
See v. United States, 479 U. S. 1048 (1987); United States v. Malis, 737 F. 2d 1511 (CA9 1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Vargas), 727 F. 2d 941 (CA10), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 819 (1984), which have refused to recognize a Fifth Amendment privilege, with United States v. Antonio J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizen Action Fund d/b/a Louisiana Citizen Action v. City of Morgan City
See City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 479 U.S. 1048 (1987) (affirming Seventh Circuit decision invalidating a city ordinance that limited solicitation to the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). 9 se violations of constitutional rights: “Threats alone are not enough.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Avon Lake
See, e.g., City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F.2d 1547 (7th Cir.1986), aff'd, 479 U.S. 1048 , 107 S.Ct. 919 , 93 L.Ed.2d 972 (1987); New Jersey Citizen Action v. Edison Twp., 797 F.2d 1250 (3d Cir.1986); Wisconsin Action Coalition v. City of Kenosha, 767 F.2d 1248 (7th Cir.1985); Association of Community Organizations for Reform v. City of Frontenac, 714 F.2d 813 (8th Cir.1983); West Virginia Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Daley, 324 S.E.2d 713 (W.Va.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Hillsboro v. Purcell
Schaumburg v. Citizens for Better Environ., 444 US 620 , 100 S Ct 826 , 63 L Ed 2d 73 (1980); see also Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, No. 87-328 (US June 29, 1988) (invalidating other restrictions on charitable and political solicitation), and Hynes v. Mayor of Oradell, 425 US 610 , 96 S Ct 1755 , 48 L Ed 2d 243 (1976) (same). 8 Compare City of Watseka v. Illinois Public Action Council, 796 F2d 1547 (7th Cir 1986), aff’d without opin, 479 US 1048 , 107 S Ct 919 , 93 L Ed 2d 972 (1987) (ordinance prohibiting solicitation for purchases of goods, services and print…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gelb
v.
United States In re Weygandt Viola v. United States Viola v. Kubitza Viola v. Arizona
v.
United States In re Weygandt Viola v. United States Viola v. Kubitza Viola v. Arizona
No. 83-5010; No. 85-7027; No. 85-7033; No. 86-5138; No. 86-5224.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1987.
Consideration, Motions, Took.
Published
ante, p. 809;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 862; and
ante, p. 804. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.
Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.