green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Allan Ross v. United States
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1227 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Turner, Unpublished Decision (4-1-1998)
See State v. Halczyszak (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 301 , 302 , certiorari denied (1987), 480 U.S. 919 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 ; Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643 , 657 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 1090 .
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Medina v. Carver, Unpublished Decision (2-4-1998)
See State v. Halczyszak (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 301 , 302 , certiorari denied (1987), 480 U.S. 919 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 ; Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643 , 657 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 1091 . "[W]here an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid[.]" Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3 , 11-12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Edmonds
(2×)
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1226-27 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Mar-kowski, 772 F.2d 358, 361-62 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018 , 106 S.Ct. 1202 , 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edmonds
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1226-27 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 (1987); United States v. Markowski, 772 F.2d 358, 361-62 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hazel Lyons, Judith Price, Terry Reese, A/K/A Terrance Towns, Angela Reese
(2×)
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1229 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987) 4 The dissent appears to have adopted Price's argument that because there is no direct evidence that she entered into the drug deal negotiations, or handed over the drugs, there is no proof against her other than her mere presence.
cited
Cited "see"
John Mancini v. City of Garfield Heights, Ohio Kenneth R. Stralka, Judge Martha T. Kapla, Clerk of Court
Moncrief v. Stone, 961 F.2d 595, 596 (6th Cir.1992); see United States v. Gluklick, 801 F.2d 834, 837 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin
See United States v. Gluklick, 801 F.2d 834, 837 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 265 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987); Wheeler v. McKinley Enterprises, 937 F.2d 1158 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Kimmons, Howard Small, United States of America v. Bruce Lee Berta
(2×)
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 (11th Cir.1986) (As each count in an indictment is separately considered, it may stand if supported by the evidence.), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); cf. Shelton v. United States, 235 F.2d 951, 954 (4th Cir.1956) (recognizing that a verdict may stand, notwithstanding certain flaws, "if the meaning of the jury is clear beyond a reasonable doubt and the verdict as finally recorded sets out their intention.").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena Vila
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1243 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Nabors, 707 F.2d 1294 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1271 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1244 (11th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1244 (11th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
David P. Wheeler v. McKinley Enterprises D/B/A Braden's Wholesale Furniture D/B/A Fowler's Fine Furniture
(2×)
See Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 265 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987) (judgment n.o.v. is only proper when the evidence is so strong that reasonable minds could not differ as to what the evidence showed). 33 To establish a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Mr. Wheeler had only to prove that age was a determining factor in Braden's decision to fire him.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elsa Ramos and Jairo Ramos
Under this standard, we must determine whether: (1) “it was the prosecutor’s manifest intention to refer to the defendant’s silence”; or (2) “the remark was of such a character that the jury would ‘naturally and necessarily’ take it to be a comment on the defendant’s silence.” Id. (quoting United States v. Edwards, 576 F.2d 1152, 1154 (5th Cir.1978)); accord United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1241-43 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987). 8 Comments meeting either of these tests may render a conviction constitutionally su…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena Vila
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1243 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Nabors, 707 F.2d 1294 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1271 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olga Boieru, Cross-Appellee v. Cuyahoga County Library Union and Service Employees International Union, District 925, Cross-Appellants
See Sahadi v. Reynolds Chemical, 636 F.2d 1116 (6th Cir.1980). 32 Jury control devices such as judgment n.o.v. or directed verdict have been recognized by courts as applicable in certain age discrimination cases due to the possibility that sympathy for the plaintiff may present an overriding but impermissible factor in a jury verdict for plaintiff. 33 Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 265 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dr. S.B. Pardazi v. Cullman Medical Center
See United States v. Gluklick, 801 F.2d 834, 837 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987); Harris Corp. v. National Iranian Radio & Tele., 691 F.2d 1344, 1352 (11th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin W. BROWNLOW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDGECOMB METALS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 266 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bienvenido Ulerio and Raphael Abreu
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1238 (11th Cir.1986) (whether transcript correctly identifies speakers question for jury determination), *1146 cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Matta-Ballesteros
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232-33 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Reed, supra, 639 F.2d at 902 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Messner v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.
See also Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 266 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Gregory v. Interface Flooring Systems, Inc.
See also Chappell v. GTE Products Corp., 803 F.2d 261, 266 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Joseph Hogan, A/K/A Hal Winter Michael Trupei
See also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1237-38 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Media Duplication Services, Ltd. v. Hdg Software, Inc., Joseph Wine
Goodrich Co., 845 F.2d 840, 841-42 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907 , 109 S.Ct. 3191 , 105 L.Ed.2d 699 , reh. denied 492 U.S. 938 , 110 S.Ct. 24 , 106 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989); Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking, 825 F.2d 437, 448 (D.C.Cir.1987); Green v. Humphrey Elevator & Truck Co., 816 F.2d 877, 879-83 (3d Cir.1987); see also United States v. Gluklick, 801 F.2d 834, 836 (6th Cir.1986) (citing with approval other courts which have held failure to acknowledge renders service invalid), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martinez
Therefore, as many courts have held, “it is the contracting foreign government, not the defendant, that would have the right to complain about a violation.” United States v. Cordero, 668 F.2d 32, 38 (1st Cir.1981); see also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232 (11th Cir.), modified in part, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Valot, 625 F.2d 308 (9th Cir.1980) (in response to assertion that abduction violated extradition treaty, held that individuals’ rights are only derivative through states, even when a t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Noriega
See also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1231 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d at 873 (“A defendant may not ordinarily assert the illegality of his obtention to defeat the court’s jurisdiction over him.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez-Lima
The Eleventh Circuit has not discussed the balancing approach used by the Fourth Circuit, although it cited the Fourth Circuit decision in Smith for the proposition that "Congress did not intend to alter the existing standards for determining relevancy and admissibility of evidence.” United States v. Anderson, 872 F.2d 1508, 1514 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 566 , 107 L.Ed.2d 560 (1989); see also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1236 (11th Cir.1986) (distinguishing district court opinion in Smith as involving mistake-of-fact and not mistake-of-láw), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolcott v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Secs. 1132 (a), 1002(2)(A), 1002(6) and 1002(7); see also Fraver v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 801 F.2d 675, 676-78 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987). 19 In order to successfully maintain an action predicated on section 502(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolcott v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
The ERISA’s vesting requirements are applicable only if: (1) Wolcott is Nationwide’s “employee” within the meaning of ERISA; (2) the ASCP is a “pension benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA; and (3) the ASCP is not a “top hat plan” which is exempted from the ERISA’s vesting requirements. 2 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 (a), 1002(2)(A), 1002(6) and 1002(7); see also Fraver v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 801 F.2d 675, 676-78 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1375 , 94 L.Ed.2d 690 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Kuwahara Co., Ltd.
See, e.g., United States v. Gluklick, 801 F.2d 834, 837 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1231 (11th Cir.), modified, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Paternina-Vergara, 749 F.2d 993, 998 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1217 , 105 S.Ct. 1197 , 84 L.Ed.2d 342 (1985); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 455-56 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981); United States v. Heller, 625 F.2d 594 599-600 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Marzano, 537 F.2d 257, 269-71 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 734 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Junior Wiles v. George Roof, Superintendent Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents- Daryl McFadden v. William Leeke, Commissioner, South Carolina Corrections Department, Respondent
See, e.g., Griffin v. Martin, 785 F.2d 1172 (4th Cir.), vacated, 795 F.2d 22 (1986) (en banc) (an evenly divided court affirmed the district court's denial of writ), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987); Thomas v. Leeke, 725 F.2d 246 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 218 , 83 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) (finding instructions similar to those here to be confusing and conflicting, and thus a violation of due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wiles v. Roof
See, e.g., Griffin v. Martin, 785 F.2d 1172 (4th Cir.), vacated, 795 F.2d 22 (1986) (en banc) (an evenly divided court affirmed the district court’s denial of writ), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1376 , 94 L.Ed.2d 691 (1987); Thomas v. Leeke, 725 F.2d 246 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 218 , 83 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) (finding instructions similar to those here to be confusing and conflicting, and thus a violation of due process).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 86-5629.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1987.
480 U.S. 919
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.