Andregg v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 484 U.S. 909 (1987). · Go Syfert
Andregg v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 484 U.S. 909 (1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Baron v. Best Buy Co., Inc. (flsd, 1999-12-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Baron v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Under federal law, it appears that an arbitration clause is unconscionable if it is inherently unfair or oppressive; See Driscoll v. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham, & Co., 815 F.2d 655, 658-59 (11th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 484 U.S. 909 , 108 S.Ct. 253 , 98 L.Ed.2d 211 (1987), on remand, 841 F.2d 1059 (11th Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andregg
v.
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
No. 87-5378.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1987.
484 U.S. 909
Published

Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.