Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. Campbell, 486 U.S. 1028 (1988). · Go Syfert
Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. Campbell, 486 U.S. 1028 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Hughes (coloctapp, 1997-04-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Hughes
Colo. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Cagle, 751 P.2d 614 (Colo.1988), appeal dismissed, 486 U.S. 1028 , 108 S.Ct. 2009 , 100 L.Ed.2d 597 (1988) (it is axiomatic that appellate courts will not consider constitutional issues raised for the first time on appeal).
discussed Cited "see" Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip (2×)
Ala. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama Power Co. v. Cantrell, 507 So.2d 1295, 1306 (Ala.1986), appeal dismissed, 486 U.S. 1028 , 108 S.Ct. 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988); Industrial Chemical, supra. The Legislature, in placing a "cap" on the award of punitive damages in all cases other than wrongful death cases (except, of course, the $1,000,000 cap in the Medical Liability Act) has essentially recognized the distinction that I have made and do make.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte Lewis
Ala. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Black Belt Wood Co. v. Sessions , 514 So.2d 1249 (Ala. 1986), and Alabama Power Co. v. Cantrell , 507 So.2d 1295 (Ala. 1986), appeal dismissed, 486 U.S. 1028 , 108 S.Ct 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Treadwell Ford, Inc.
v.
Campbell
No. 85-1799.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1988.
486 U.S. 1028
Appeal, Connor, Consideration, Dismiss, Question, Respect, Scalia, Took, Want.
Published

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ala. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Justice O’Connor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy would dismiss the appeal with respect to Question 1 for want of a substantial federal question; with respect to Question 2, they would dismiss the appeal for want of a properly presented federal question. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.