Halloran v. New York, 486 U.S. 1028 (1988). · Go Syfert
Halloran v. New York, 486 U.S. 1028 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip (ala, 1989-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip (2×)
Ala. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama Power Co. v. Cantrell, 507 So.2d 1295, 1306 (Ala.1986), appeal dismissed, 486 U.S. 1028 , 108 S.Ct. 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988); Industrial Chemical, supra. The Legislature, in placing a "cap" on the award of punitive damages in all cases other than wrongful death cases (except, of course, the $1,000,000 cap in the Medical Liability Act) has essentially recognized the distinction that I have made and do make.
discussed Cited "see" Clardy v. Sanders (2×)
Ala. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Alabama Power Co. v. Cantrell , 507 So.2d 1295 , 1306 (Ala. 1986), appeal dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Buchannon v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Mobile Dodge, Inc. v. Alford , 487 So.2d 866 (Ala. 1986), appeal dismissed, *Page 488 ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988); Felder v. State , 515 So.2d 17 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte Lewis
Ala. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Black Belt Wood Co. v. Sessions , 514 So.2d 1249 (Ala. 1986), and Alabama Power Co. v. Cantrell , 507 So.2d 1295 (Ala. 1986), appeal dismissed, 486 U.S. 1028 , 108 S.Ct 2008 , 100 L.Ed.2d 596 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Halloran
v.
New York
No. 87-1595.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1988.
486 U.S. 1028
Published

Appeal from App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.